Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More Proof That Armstrong/Jenkins Was A Catchweight Title Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by fugu View Post
    Since when is agreeing to move DOWN to make it easier on an opponent a bad thing? That speaks volume of Armstrongs character.

    Not to mention, the only reason why you are bringing this up is because of the Manny Pacquiao/Henry Armstrong comparison thread. The problem with Manny is that he is in a way trying to "cheat" history when in fact, only his lineal champ achievements should be what counts when compared to Armstrong. Not catchweight titlefights or winning a paperbelt vs a mediocre opponent.
    You know what's funny is that Bernard Hopkins gets so much **** for his catchweight fights on this forum when he moved down (against oscar, winky, and pavlik) in weight, and everyone says oh he just picks on smaller fighters, but for some reason it's the opposite when it comes to pacquiao who moves up in weight in these catchweight bouts, so I guess we should say oh pacquiao just likes to pick on bigger fighters

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by fugu View Post
      Since when is agreeing to move DOWN to make it easier on an opponent a bad thing? That speaks volume of Armstrongs character.
      True. Same thing people said about Oscar when he fought Pac. Except not.

      Fail.

      Comment

      Working...
      X
      TOP