who would win ?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
julian jackson vs tommy hearns
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Tengoshi View PostAt 154 pretty much a toss-up. I would go with Jackson though, I think his chin was more solid and he had more power than anyone Hearns was ever in against.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostI've always thought McClellan's power was over rated. I wouldn't put Norris in the same league either and neither were as good as Hearns. Only my opinion though.
Norris' power which the Hawk weathered without much issue. The only fighter to give him trouble with power prior to that was McCallum, also a big hitter.
I never really bought into McClellan's power being overrated, he put down many great fighters like it was nothing right out of the gate (he's about the only guy you could believe when he predicted first round KOs, which he almost delivered on even against Benn). Except for the Benn fight during which he was breaking down, he never went past eight in his entire career. I think he was able to dispose of Jackson so easily because he was hyper-aggressive, more so than Hearns certainly. Hearns wouldn't be able to go right at Jackson in that manner, so I don't think he would pose as much of a threat to Jackson. The speed advantage would easily be with Hearns, but like Barkley Jackson only has to wait for that one mistake to put him down.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tengoshi View PostIt's obvious Hearns hit harder than Norris, but that doesn't take away from
Norris' power which the Hawk weathered without much issue. The only fighter to give him trouble with power prior to that was McCallum, also a big hitter.
I never really bought into McClellan's power being overrated, he put down many great fighters like it was nothing right out of the gate (he's about the only guy you could believe when he predicted first round KOs, which he almost delivered on even against Benn). Except for the Benn fight during which he was breaking down, he never went past eight in his entire career. I think he was able to dispose of Jackson so easily because he was hyper-aggressive, more so than Hearns certainly. Hearns wouldn't be able to go right at Jackson in that manner, so I don't think he would pose as much of a threat to Jackson. The speed advantage would easily be with Hearns, but like Barkley Jackson only has to wait for that one mistake to put him down.
Comment
-
i cannot see Jackson getting past Hearns incredible boxing skills and see him getting `bombed-out` within 2rds.. Jackson fought lots of Class C fighters and tomato cans he was soundly beaten by McCallum inside 2rds because he could not deal with McCallums boxing skills, Hearns would be aware of Jacksons punching power and go for the kill right from the opening bell, reach, speed & ability all lie with Hearns
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostOutside of Jackson I don't see any great middleweights G-Man put down and Gerald was imo a much bigger middleweight. That said, it would still come down to who landed first here. I favor Tommy, but only a fool would dismiss Jackson.Last edited by Miburo; 06-03-2010, 03:33 AM.
Comment
Comment