Hearns was a freakishly big welterweight?

[DeepSleep]

Hearns was a massive Welterweight and any argument otherwise is silly, a lanky fighter is a P.Williams or Ali Funeka look. Hearns somehow managed to stay at 147 with his frame and still pack on loads of muscle on his back and core.

[r.burgundy]

Hearns was a massive Welterweight and any argument otherwise is silly, a lanky fighter is a P.Williams or Ali Funeka look. Hearns somehow managed to stay at 147 with his frame and still pack on loads of muscle on his back and core.

using the term massive to describe a 147 lb man is plain silly but hey

[StarshipTrooper]

Well, we do know one thing: r.burgundy is a freakishly moronic poster

Poet

[mickey malone]

Main Entry: lanky
Pronunciation: \ˈlaŋ-kē\
Function: adjective
Inflected Form(s): lank·i·er; lank·i·est
Date: circa 1818

: ungracefully tall and thin
synonyms see lean

— lank·i·ly \-kə-lē\ adverb

— lank·i·ness \-kē-nəs\ noun

would you like to fail some more lol?

he wasnt even a big ww.tall yes,big no.

Good adjectives for, McCrory, Breland, Blocker, Bumphus, Saddler, Al Brown, Johnny Owen, Tony Pep etc, but not Hearns..

Reason - Hearns had a much bigger upper torso, which is why he was able to compete at 6 different weights.. Very similar to Bob Fitzsimmons who was a large MW..

Your failings have already been displayed on the poll..

[JAB5239]

using the term massive to describe a 147 lb man is plain silly but hey

Sure it is, if you're comparing him to not in his weight class. You have a simple way out of this Ron....in all of history JUST name 10 bigger welterweights. There have been thousands of them, naming 10 who achieved Hearns greatness should be easy if you're right. Whats the problem?

[Mares]

well i voted no.... i dont even know this ****.. lol

[NChristo]

well i voted no.... i dont even know this ****.. lol

You don't know who Tommy Hearns is ?.