Personally I think that Robinson was a quite a bit more accomplished at welterweight than Leonard. Also, Robinson was approaching the twilight of his legendary career in the middleweight days. I think Greb, Hagler, Monzon can all be argued to be more accomplished middleweights.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The best of all time have one thing in common
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View PostHeavyweight - Muhammad Ali
Light-heavyweight - Ezzard Charles
supermiddleweight - Roy Jones
Middleweight - Ray Robinson
Welterweight - Ray Leonard
Light-welterweight - Aaron Pryor
Lightweight - Roberto Duran
Featherweight - Manny Pacquiao
Bantamweight - Ruben Olivares
Flyweight - Jimmy Wilde
They are recognized as the very best at their weight and they all had SPEED.
Pacquiao should be rated at catchweight.. How can you rate him above someone who had over 200 fights at 126?Last edited by mickey malone; 04-16-2010, 02:49 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View PostHeavyweight - Muhammad Ali
Light-heavyweight - Ezzard Charles
supermiddleweight - Roy Jones
Middleweight - Ray Robinson
Welterweight - Ray Leonard
Light-welterweight - Aaron Pryor
Lightweight - Roberto Duran
Featherweight - Manny Pacquiao
Bantamweight - Ruben Olivares
Flyweight - Jimmy Wilde
They are recognized as the very best at their weight and they all had SPEED.
Pacquiao the best Featherweight of all time??? WHAT THE ****??????
SRL greater at 147 than Robinson and Armstrong????
disgraceful
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mickey malone View PostOr was it COKE? lol
Pacquiao should be rated at catchweight.. How can you rate him above someone who had over 200 fights at 126?
pacquiao has never dominated a divison....how the **** can Pacquiao be called the best of any division???? he has been picking and choosing fighters going up weight classes.......not to mention creating weight classes of his own and winning titles which were in the wrong weight class
Comment
-
****in unbelievable...i started this topic on the subject of ATG fighters having one thing in common which is speed, yet after 14 replies there is not a single poster who has addressed the topic instead they have called into question the list of fighters i put up for the weight divisions claiming, "he should not be in there and he could not beat him etc etc etc" ****in bunch of ******s who twist everything away from the sport of boxing simply because they dont have the knowledge of the sport to debate it, and instead try to impose their preffered favorite boxer list onto us... one guy is even calling into question Ray Robinson being an ATG... "Talk about flogging a dead horse" pheeewwww
Comment
-
Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post****in unbelievable...i started this topic on the subject of ATG fighters having one thing in common which is speed, yet after 14 replies there is not a single poster who has addressed the topic instead they have called into question the list of fighters i put up for the weight divisions claiming, "he should not be in there and he could not beat him etc etc etc" ****in bunch of ******s who twist everything away from the sport of boxing simply because they dont have the knowledge of the sport to debate it, and instead try to impose their preffered favorite boxer list onto us... one guy is even calling into question Ray Robinson being an ATG... "Talk about flogging a dead horse" pheeewwww
Light-heavyweight - Ezzard Charles
supermiddleweight - Roy Jones
Middleweight - Ray Robinson
Welterweight - Ray Leonard
Light-welterweight - Aaron Pryor
Lightweight - Roberto Duran
Featherweight - Manny Pacquiao
Bantamweight - Ruben Olivares
Flyweight - Jimmy Wilde
They are recognized as the very best at their weight and they all had SPEED.
Agreed they were all fast fighters.. Topic closed then?
Comment
Comment