He mostly beat up on contenders and didnt beat one! great fighter, besides **** tiger who he won the title off
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Any one else think bob foster had a very weak title reign?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by TheGreatA View PostHe beat everyone there was. I guess he could have beaten up more blown up great fighters but they weren't willing to face him, so he had to move up against the likes of Ali and Frazier to challenge himself.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joey Giardello View PostYes i agree its was not bob's fault, but its a weak resume of title defences
Comment
-
Is this because lots of people said he would have beaten Carlos Monzon if he had moved up? You feel the need to show that he had a weak LHW run and wasn't as good as people make him out to be?
I'm not bagging you, I'm being quite serious. You put up that thread only the other day asking about them fighting and he (Foster) won it by a little bit, so is this why or were you just thinking about Bob Foster's reign over tea and cookies this morning?
Anyway, yes and no. It wasn't the best LHW title run ever, bit it wasn't weak. It didn't have the Napoles and Griffith names, but they were only names by that stage anyway so it was no different than them having no name.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BennyST View PostIs this because lots of people said he would have beaten Carlos Monzon if he had moved up? You feel the need to show that he had a weak LHW run and wasn't as good as people make him out to be?
I'm not bagging you, I'm being quite serious. You put up that thread only the other day asking about them fighting and he (Foster) won it by a little bit, so is this why or were you just thinking about Bob Foster's reign over tea and cookies this morning?
Anyway, yes and no. It wasn't the best LHW title run ever, bit it wasn't weak. It didn't have the Napoles and Griffith names, but they were only names by that stage anyway so it was no different than them having no name.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joey Giardello View PostIt had nothing to do with monzon, was just looking at foster's record and i thought it looked a bit weak. Also the first time monzon fought emile griffith he was far from over the hill! and when he fought napoles, jose was welterweight champion and some considerd him the best fighter in the sport at that time. Also forget about napoles and griffith, foster hasnt got names as good as the likes of nino and brisco
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joey Giardello View PostIt had nothing to do with monzon, was just looking at foster's record and i thought it looked a bit weak. Also the first time monzon fought emile griffith he was far from over the hill! and when he fought napoles, jose was welterweight champion and some considerd him the best fighter in the sport at that time. Also forget about napoles and griffith, foster hasnt got names as good as the likes of nino and brisco
Comment
-
-
Comment