Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Greatest Latino Fighter of all time?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    JCC and Wilfredo GOmez

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by IwatchBoxing
      Whatever bro, dont hate the player hate the game, its obvoius you have something against Trinidad, and something for Mexicans, that you wont let their nuts out your mouth, its all kool, when Trinidad beats Hopkins than we'll talk, P.S. Puerto Rico has better boxers than the British, weep.

      has it really? I take issue with that my friend.
      based on what cotto and tito? you need to live up to your name and stop nut hugging and start watching boxing mate.

      try these for starters Johnny Nelson, Joe Calzaghe, Hatton, Witter, Froch, Haye, Clinton Woods, Carl Thompson, Robin Reid, Eastman, Scot Harrison, Wayne Mcullough, Damen Kelly.


      all independently top ten ranked.

      lets see yours.


      To Jabs my mate, Sanchez quite simply cos in terms of what he achieved in such a time for one so young it blatently points to him being more skilled and talented than trinindad. Also beating the professor is a better scalp than Tito has on his resume. period.

      you are talking aobut a man who is rated top five all time featherweight in terms of skills and as a champ and he died so young, Sanchez should really be one of the last names on the list you are challenging, Tito is a top five nothing good solid power puncher but a legend no chance.

      Taken on some less than in their prime champs, and won a disputed decision over de la hoya and get his ass whipped by hopkins thats not the stuff of legend no.

      I dont mind tito but when people start crapping on about top ten of all time it makes me wanna ****.

      i do the same over Pac as well, good fighter with still a lot to prove.

      basically im anti nuthugging when it comes to historically ranking fighters, I havent even done any research to the real olden days but am sure I could come up with another ten who could probably be ranked over tito in an all time latino list if I could be arsed.

      all of this is just my opinion but i dont hate trinidad I just think like pac he is overated by many on here.

      hers toa good fight at the weekend anyway enjoy guys and "iwatchboxing" im sure you will be enjoy.
      Last edited by J !; 05-12-2005, 07:35 AM.

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by JPW
        has it really? I take issue with that my friend.
        based on what cotto and tito? you need to live up to your name and stop nut hugging and start watching boxing mate.

        try these for starters Johnny Nelson, Joe Calzaghe, Hatton, Witter, Froch, Haye, Clinton Woods, Carl Thompson, Robin Reid, Eastman, Scot Harrison, Wayne Mcullough, Damen Kelly.


        all independently top ten ranked.

        lets see yours.


        To Jabs my mate, Sanchez quite simply cos in terms of what he achieved in such a time for one so young it blatently points to him being more skilled and talented than trinindad. Also beating the professor is a better scalp than Tito has on his resume. period.

        you are talking aobut a man who is rated top five all time featherweight in terms of skills and as a champ and he died so young, Sanchez should really be one of the last names on the list you are challenging, Tito is a top five nothing good solid power puncher but a legend no chance.

        Taken on some less than in their prime champs, and won a disputed decision over de la hoya and get his ass whipped by hopkins thats not the stuff of legend no.

        I dont mind tito but when people start crapping on about top ten of all time it makes me wanna ****.

        i do the same over Pac as well, good fighter with still a lot to prove.

        basically im anti nuthugging when it comes to historically ranking fighters, I havent even done any research to the real olden days but am sure I could come up with another ten who could probably be ranked over tito in an all time latino list if I could be arsed.

        all of this is just my opinion but i dont hate trinidad I just think like pac he is overated by many on here.

        hers toa good fight at the weekend anyway enjoy guys and "iwatchboxing" im sure you will be enjoy.

        When Sanchez beat the "Professor".....he was more like a grade-school student.
        If they rematched a year later....Nelson would have won. I hold that win AGAINST Sanchez....even though Nelson became a great fighter.

        Sanchez only shined against one kind of fighter....a face-firster.
        Danny Lopez & Gomez came charging into sanchez with no regards for defense (well, Lopez never had any defense).
        When Sanchez faced guys who gave him movement, he looked ordinary, was greatly troubled.


        If you think all Trinidad has is a punch JPW.....I really don't understand. You're a good, knowledgable poster....I'd expect that you'd realize a one-dimensional puncher (like Cuevas, Ruddock, etc.) would never have risen up through various weight classes & beaten the guys Trinidad has.

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by JPW
          you are talking aobut a man who is rated top five all time featherweight in terms of skills and as a champ and he died so young, Sanchez should really be one of the last names on the list you are challenging, Tito is a top five nothing good solid power puncher but a legend no chance.

          Taken on some less than in their prime champs, and won a disputed decision over de la hoya and get his ass whipped by hopkins thats not the stuff of legend no.
          Rated top five by who? Haters like you? Even Hearns won a disputed decision against Benitez who beat Durans ass, than got dominated by Hagler. Chavez won a disputed decision against Taylor who was stoped on his feet with 2 sec's left on the clock, and he got dominated by Pernell Whitaker, who Trinidad beat with a record of 40-2-1. Duran has been dominated and just flat out QUIT in one of his fights, like Chavez did. You hold that against him cause your a hater. Sanchez beat Gomez, and thats about it, too young, he would probaly have been greater.
          Last edited by IwatchBoxing; 05-12-2005, 10:27 AM.

          Comment


            #55
            I was just reading this thread and saw the following quote


            try these for starters Johnny Nelson, Joe Calzaghe, Hatton, Witter, Froch, Haye, Clinton Woods, Carl Thompson, Robin Reid, Eastman, Scot Harrison, Wayne Mcullough, Damen Kelly.


            HOW THE HELL CAN anybody put Johnny Nelson in as an example of World Class the guy is the biggest joke in British Boxing history he I ashamed when I hear people call him world class no wonder the say boxing is a mug games. In case u need reminding Johnny Nelson is the So called world class fighter that when he got his first title chance he did not just blew it but going all out instead he does not throw punch in in his two World Title attempts against Carlos De Leon and James Warring, then he gets a gift over Carl Thompson, he is a disgrace and has never really beaten a true world class fighter where the ending is not controvesial.

            Do u hear anybody talking about unification fights with Nelson only Enzo because his title that he holds nothing and needs something, what makes me laugh I cannot understand how much talk went on about how nelson was going to fight Jirov, Mike Tyson but I am sure the promoters must have also remembered his fight against Henry Akinwiade, the guy does not deserve to be called a fighter it was only last year there was a kidnapp plot to get him off sky sports because his fights were that bad thank god sky sports dropped him by not showing his fights

            Comment


              #56
              rudyt liek it or not mate he is rated top ten.

              he is a class counterpuncher just cos you dont like his style, id like you to name me ten cruisers who are better than him.

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by IwatchBoxing
                Rated top five by who? Haters like you? Even Hearns won a disputed decision against Benitez who beat Durans ass, than got dominated by Hagler. Chavez won a disputed decision against Taylor who was stoped on his feet with 2 sec's left on the clock, and he got dominated by Pernell Whitaker, who Trinidad beat with a record of 40-2-1. Duran has been dominated and just flat out QUIT in one of his fights, like Chavez did. You hold that against him cause your a hater. Sanchez beat Gomez, and thats about it, too young, he would probaly have been greater.

                so sanchez isnt a top five featherweifht of all time then.

                i thitnk you need to do some reading sunshine.

                i dont hate tito i just rate him as highly as you get over it.

                ****inell this place is doing my head in im off for a while.

                ill be back though probas after winky beats up your heroes ass

                Comment


                  #58
                  Originally posted by JPW
                  so sanchez isnt a top five featherweifht of all time then.

                  i thitnk you need to do some reading sunshine.

                  i dont hate tito i just rate him as highly as you get over it.

                  ****inell this place is doing my head in im off for a while.

                  ill be back though probas after winky beats up your heroes ass
                  Sure, when you come back dont forget to let go of the Mexicans nuts .

                  Comment


                    #59
                    im all late in this thread but...The Greatest Latino Fighter of all time is ROBERTO DURAN. If you cannot get past this then please stop watching/participating in the sport of boxing.

                    Comment


                      #60
                      I say it's Julio Cesar Chavez

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP