Who ranks higher? Trinidad or De La Hoya?

[zoneman99]

Simple question. Who ranks higher and why?

[CCobra]

Tito. Has some very good wins on his resume and only ever lost to 3 ATG fighters. When Tito won, he won.

Oscar has way too many questionable victories on his resume.. Whitaker, Quartey, Sturm and made a career out of beating Tito's leftover fighters. He can cry about the Tito fight all he wants but he only has himself to blame for running the last 5 rounds which lost him the fight.

[Marcov]

Trinidad has one big questionble victory on his resume, that is why I voted for "De La". Both accomplished alot though.

[BEEHOP]

Tito by a bit.

[DeepSleep]

I'd give Tito the edge. I think too many of Oscar's "victories" are rather suspect to me as when I score his fights I'm often left wondering what the judges are watching, still both fighters were great.

[prinzmanspoper]

Trinidad has one big questionble victory on his resume, that is why I voted for "De La". Both accomplished alot though.

Ike Quartey and Pernell Whitaker are without question two of De La Hoya's greatest wins,and the verdict is split on whether for not he deserved the decisions there also.

[Sugarj]

Oscar for me but only by a whisker! Very equal in resume.

[Argentine]

De La Hoya

[gibo]

TITO fought above his natural weight and lost to bigger bernie, WINKY, RJJ!!! delohoyo fought against SMALLER SSM X2, PBF, AND PAC-MAN and got his *ss exposed! So who do you really think ranks higher?????

[cooper5]

If you look at welterweight and up only I would lean towards Tito, (aside from the fact Oscar really beat him in their match.)

But Oscar also had a career that spanned from 130-140 lbs and with that in mind, I voted for Oscar.