Although I haven't watched the fight in ages, I've always felt that Ken Buchanan may have been harshly treated..
I remember the fight being stopped at the end of the 13th, after Ken had been floored with a blatant low blow, only a slpit second before the bell sounded..
Then, I can only recall the ref, hastilly waving the fight off as Buchanan writhed in agony, while simultaneously attempting to protest..
Have I got this wrong?.. Or did Buchanan tell the ref, he couldn't continue?
I've seen a documentury, in which Duran openly admits to hitting him low, and then laughs it off while saying that he had to out tough Buchanan in order to make him quit..
Should Duran have been disqualified?
Should Buchanan have been given time to recover?
Or was Kenny completely beaten and deserved to lose his title?
Shortly after losing the title, Buchanan was still good enough to beat Jim Watt, so why wasn't he given a rematch with Duran?
I look forward to your thoughts and opinions.. mm
I remember the fight being stopped at the end of the 13th, after Ken had been floored with a blatant low blow, only a slpit second before the bell sounded..
Then, I can only recall the ref, hastilly waving the fight off as Buchanan writhed in agony, while simultaneously attempting to protest..
Have I got this wrong?.. Or did Buchanan tell the ref, he couldn't continue?
I've seen a documentury, in which Duran openly admits to hitting him low, and then laughs it off while saying that he had to out tough Buchanan in order to make him quit..
Should Duran have been disqualified?
Should Buchanan have been given time to recover?
Or was Kenny completely beaten and deserved to lose his title?
Shortly after losing the title, Buchanan was still good enough to beat Jim Watt, so why wasn't he given a rematch with Duran?
I look forward to your thoughts and opinions.. mm
Comment