Mike McCallum vs Michael Watson

[sonnyboyx2]

Watsons comments in the corner between rounds 9/10 & 10/11 its a shame they have been left out

[Emon723]

McCallum would beat both Benn and Eubank in their primes, and it was his former victim, Irishman Steve Collins, that caught a shot Benn and Eubank.

[Obama]

McCallum would beat both Benn and Eubank in their primes, and it was his former victim, Irishman Steve Collins, that caught a shot Benn and Eubank.

Eubank was not shot. He also debatably beat Collins in both fights.

[Bright-Eyes]

Eubank was not shot. He also debatably beat Collins in both fights.

Eubank's career at 168 is fairly mediocre,he had so many poor performances at that weight and many decisons that he did not deserve.When he was a middleweight he was very good and it's a shame that he could no longer make the weight and he was very tentative after the second Michael Watson fight.

I've never heard anyone claim that Eubank deserved to beat Collins in either fight.

[coghaugen]

No big difference between middleweight, super-middleweight.

His best performance pre-Watson II came at super-middle against Welshman Denys Cronin in Cardiff - combinations thrown with speed, power, accuracy and dexterity and from virtually no room. And his best Ever performance came against Graciano Rocchi - post-Watson II.

At 168 Chris had Watson, Benn and Collins outdoor rematches, fights with Rocchi and Calzaghe and a fantastic night against Wharton.