Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How Would These Two Fare Against Daniel Dubois?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #11
    Originally posted by Bronson66 View Post

    In between those wins Valdez was the number one,at the end of 1953,and 1954.
    - - Then Valdez not only shouldn't have got whooped by Archie, his mgr should've placed a full length notice in the newspaper like Archie did to fight Rocky.

    But he didn't...

    Comment

      #12
      Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

      - - Then Valdez not only shouldn't have got whooped by Archie, his mgr should've placed a full length notice in the newspaper like Archie did to fight Rocky.

      But he didn't...
      The tile difference between Valdes' loss to Moore was 2years and 2 months months,plenty of time for Marciano to fight his no 1 contender,who during that period beat
      Charles no1
      Jackson no 8
      Neuhaus no8
      and 8 others.
      Should a fighter get preference for a title shot because he takes out adverts in papers,or because he defeats the no 1 contender Charles,[ who beat Moore 3 out of 3'] plus 2 other top ten ranked men and 8 other fighters including
      Agramonte and Sys.?
      Willow The Wisp Willow The Wisp likes this.
      • Likes 1

      Comment

        #13
        Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

        - - Then Valdez not only shouldn't have got whooped by Archie, his mgr should've placed a full length notice in the newspaper like Archie did to fight Rocky.

        But he didn't...
        The tile difference between Valdes' loss to Moore was 2years and 2 months months,plenty of time for Marciano to fight his no 1 contender,who during that period beat
        Charles no1
        Jackson no 8
        Neuhaus no8
        and 8 others.
        Should a fighter get preference for a title shot because he takes out adverts in papers,or because he defeats the no 1 contender Charles,[ who beat Moore 3 out of 3'] plus 2 other top ten ranked men and 8 other fighters including
        Agramonte and Sys.?
        Who should I fight, a 41years old light heavyweight,or the number one contender?

        Comment

          #14
          Originally posted by Bronson66 View Post

          The tile difference between Valdes' loss to Moore was 2years and 2 months months,plenty of time for Marciano to fight his no 1 contender,who during that period beat
          Charles no1
          Jackson no 8
          Neuhaus no8
          and 8 others.
          Should a fighter get preference for a title shot because he takes out adverts in papers,or because he defeats the no 1 contender Charles,[ who beat Moore 3 out of 3'] plus 2 other top ten ranked men and 8 other fighters including
          Agramonte and Sys.?
          Who should I fight, a 41years old light heavyweight,or the number one contender?
          - - Myself and Rocky fight the 41 yr old contender who whooped the #1 contender...double DUH !!

          Comment

          Working...
          X
          TOP