Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Does Anyone Agree With Teddy Atlas' Latest Take on Mike Tyson?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by tokon View Post

    Well, as you've already acknowledged a past-prime holyfield beat a past-prime Tyson so, other than just speculation and opinion, that's probably the closest measure we have.
    - - Actually we have retired Mike beating up retired Roy Jones, and retired Vander humiliated by a retired UFC fighter.

    Thanks for the reminder…

    Comment


      Originally posted by Rockin' View Post

      The Klitschkos were nothing close to the dominance of Mike Tyson.

      Unless, of course, you consider fighting half of the bout and then holding for the other half equals greatness.

      I don't...............Rockin'
      It took a long time for anyone to solve that puzzle.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Rockin' View Post

        Punch counting is for the amateurs, not the pros.

        I agree 100%..................Rockin'
        - - Pros are the Kbros who all these years later coming up on a decade still has you squealin' like a stuck pig after dominating the Heavyweight rankins like nobody has ever seen before, their collective being 109-7, 94 KO with something like 40 title fight wins, most of them unified by Wlad.

        Yes, they never needed punch numbers because they dominated by official scoring some 90% of the rounds they contested.

        Look, it's OK to big up your fallen heros. We understand

        Comment

        Working...
        X
        TOP