Originally posted by Willow The Wisp
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why do people still put Joe Louis as the best HW with his outdated and poor mechanics?
Collapse
-
How the hell did Chris Byrd cut down to 174 for the George fight in 2008 after fighting between 210 - 215 since 1995.
That's kind of freaky.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View PostHow the hell did Chris Byrd cut down to 174 for the George fight in 2008 after fighting between 210 - 215 since 1995.
That's kind of freaky.Slugfester GhostofDempsey like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
Yes, I don't mean to disparage all modern day HWs, but a majority of them are flat-footed, fat, and fairly one-dimensional. Jab, straight right hand, an occasional hook, very little body work, clunky footwork, low stamina, poor defense. Louis knew how to cut off the ring, create traps, work the body, slip a jab, counter-punch, close the distance. I don't see a lot or any of that from most modern HWs.
game.them_apples Willow The Wisp like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View PostHow the hell did Chris Byrd cut down to 174 for the George fight in 2008 after fighting between 210 - 215 since 1995.
That's kind of freaky.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
He was a middleweight in the amateurs right before he turned pro. He was always a blown up LHW, probably would have been unbeatable at cruiserweight but there was no money there.
obviously outgrows it I'm a few years. Lightheavy 175, than cruiser. Byrd was never a heavyweight by today's standards. Bit he was successful . Thats what drives me nuts about the size mongers. I'd Byrd was successful, there should be no doubt guys like Louis and Liston would be more successful. The whole they didn't have movement is BS. They had movement, they just minimized it which is so much smarter in my opinion.Willow The Wisp GhostofDempsey like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
Yes, I don't mean to disparage all modern day HWs, but a majority of them are flat-footed, fat, and fairly one-dimensional. Jab, straight right hand, an occasional hook, very little body work, clunky footwork, low stamina, poor defense. Louis knew how to cut off the ring, create traps, work the body, slip a jab, counter-punch, close the distance. I don't see a lot or any of that from most modern HWs.
Louis was painstakingly taught these things day and night until he had them instinctively down. Blackburn's methods (predominant in those days) were to first assess a fighter's physical and mental makeup, and essentially develop a fighting style, or "martial art" within the rules of the sport, AROUND those unique characteristics. This was how Blackburn himself learned the craft in Terre Haute, Altoona, Pittsburgh and Philadelphia at the turn of the last century.
Not only did Louis exhibit superb ability to cut off the ring, create traps, work the body, slip a jab, counter-punch, close the distance, etc., but so did John Henry Lewis, Billy Conn, Max Schmeling, Jim Braddock, Patsy Perroni, Bob Pastor, Nathan Mann, Roy Lazer, Charley Retzlaff, Al McCoy, Johnny Paycheck, Lee Ramage, Jack Sharkey, Al Ettore, Harry Thomas, Lou Nova, Tami Maureallo, etc.
...For real.them_apples GhostofDempsey like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willow The Wisp View Post
School was harder back in those times, including the ones that taught the art of boxing. Has anyone here ever heard a legendary trainer EVER say any different?
Louis was painstakingly taught these things day and night until he had them instinctively down. Blackburn's methods (predominant in those days) were to first assess a fighter's physical and mental makeup, and essentially develop a fighting style, or "martial art" within the rules of the sport, AROUND those unique characteristics. This was how Blackburn himself learned the craft in Terre Haute, Altoona, Pittsburgh and Philadelphia at the turn of the last century.
Not only did Louis exhibit superb ability to cut off the ring, create traps, work the body, slip a jab, counter-punch, close the distance, etc., but so did John Henry Lewis, Billy Conn, Max Schmeling, Jim Braddock, Patsy Perroni, Bob Pastor, Nathan Mann, Roy Lazer, Charley Retzlaff, Al McCoy, Johnny Paycheck, Lee Ramage, Jack Sharkey, Al Ettore, Harry Thomas, Lou Nova, Tami Maureallo, etc.
...For real.
Speaking of trainers Eddie Futch named .in no order Louis,Johnson, and Ali as his three greatest heavyweightsthem_apples Willow The Wisp like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willow The Wisp View Post
School was harder back in those times, including the ones that taught the art of boxing. Has anyone here ever heard a legendary trainer EVER say any different?
Louis was painstakingly taught these things day and night until he had them instinctively down. Blackburn's methods (predominant in those days) were to first assess a fighter's physical and mental makeup, and essentially develop a fighting style, or "martial art" within the rules of the sport, AROUND those unique characteristics. This was how Blackburn himself learned the craft in Terre Haute, Altoona, Pittsburgh and Philadelphia at the turn of the last century.
Not only did Louis exhibit superb ability to cut off the ring, create traps, work the body, slip a jab, counter-punch, close the distance, etc., but so did John Henry Lewis, Billy Conn, Max Schmeling, Jim Braddock, Patsy Perroni, Bob Pastor, Nathan Mann, Roy Lazer, Charley Retzlaff, Al McCoy, Johnny Paycheck, Lee Ramage, Jack Sharkey, Al Ettore, Harry Thomas, Lou Nova, Tami Maureallo, etc.
...For real.
Comment
Comment