<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ATGG-All Time Great Goof

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    ATGG-All Time Great Goof

    I don't acknowledge the legitimacy of the "Junior" and "Super" weight classes. These divisions where invented by the sanctioning bodies to create roughly double the number of champions out there, which doubles the number of title fights, which in turn doubles the amount of money that flows into the alphabet boys coffers via sanctioning fees. These divisions are not recognised in my ATG lists. Fighters who fough predominately at one of these phony weight classes gets rated at the next highest legitmate weight class. For example, a fighter who fought primarily at Junior-Welterweight would be rated at Welterweight.
    ** But you have no problem rating 'Vander over Tyson and Wlad, both of whom have better heavy title records than him and better career records than him.

    Guy was handed the unified heavy title over the overweight Buster in his last bout on his way to almost losing his life in a diabetic coma a few years later. It was Tyson who did the heavy lifting, unifying 4 belts in 4 separate fights, a feat still unmatched.

    Thank goodness for the alphabets or 'Vander wouldn't be the 4x heavy champ everyone always shouts about. Heck, Valuev is already the 2X champ and looks to be going strong for another 5 yrs and might match 'Vander if Ruiz don't beat him to it.

    Well, I don't want to crack too hard on 'mander'Vander, poor fellas got enough problems to bother the Pope these days. Just havin' some "Jimmy pop corn and I don't care" sport with Poet, don't ya know it!.......

    #2
    Oh yeah i remember this thread ''Poet'' done about ATG Lists. Here it is for anyone who hasn't saw it. Everyone has there on views on rating and lists of ATG's, but you and poet 682006 always seem to clash on the history of boxing.
    //krikya360.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=247307

    Comment


      #3
      LondonRingRules and Poet682006 always seem to clash here in the history section, especially on the Heavyweights.

      It's boxingscene's version of the Ali/Frazier rivalry.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by The_Bringer View Post
        LondonRingRules and Poet682006 always seem to clash here in the history section, especially on the Heavyweights.

        It's boxingscene's version of the Ali/Frazier rivalry.
        There have been some really heated arguments on here between the two, and i can see there being some more serious one's in the future between them.

        Now that Poet682006 has been unbanned.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Southpaw16bf View Post
          There have been some really heated arguments on here between the two, and i can see there being some more serious one's in the future between them.

          Now that Poet682006 has been unbanned.
          Now it's got that Tyson/Holyfield feel to it.

          Poet coming back from the ban is like Mike getting out of prison. Only we know he'll perform just as well as he ever did.

          Comment


            #6
            Except the only time I ever see any of LRR's posts is when someone quotes his and then I may take a few pot shots. Otherwise I really don't have time to waste on that senile crack-pot.

            Poet

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by The_Bringer View Post
              LondonRingRules and Poet682006 always seem to clash here in the history section, especially on the Heavyweights.

              It's boxingscene's version of the Ali/Frazier rivalry.
              because londonringrules is a delusional fuckwit

              Comment


                #8
                I disagree with the specific post by poet especially since 130 and 140 have been around since before WW2.

                LRR is by and large the best writer on this website, too bad I agree with him 10% of the time.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by wmute View Post
                  LRR is by and large the best writer on this website, too bad I agree with him 10% of the time.
                  Well, I would say if I agreed with someone only 10% of the time that they were an idiot that has nothing intelligent to add to the forum and hence NOT a good writer.

                  Poet

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
                    Well, I would say if I agreed with someone only 10% of the time that they were an idiot that has nothing intelligent to add to the forum and hence NOT a good writer.

                    Poet
                    u mean guys who says duran is a bum bcoz he lost to vinnie pazienza & that floyd mayweather will gatti him?

                    just dont mind them my man...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP