<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

True Multi-Division WORLD Champions

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    True Multi-Division WORLD Champions

    I know these days we hear it alot. So and so has been a world champion at 4 different classes. However, few people outside of the hardcore boxing crowd make a distinction between belt holder and lineal champion.

    With that being said, how many true multi-division world champions have their been during the recent past? With all of these guys moving up (and down) in weight classes and winning pieces of the Alphabet soup have any of them actually won multiple world titles as opposed to just winning belts?

    Do all of the alphabet boys water down the accomplishment of winning true multiple-world titles? Do you personally make a direct distinction between lineal champion and WBA/WBC/IBF/IBO/WBO, etc. title holders?
    Last edited by Hawkins; 10-18-2007, 07:28 PM.

    #2
    Leonard was a true multi division Champ for beating Hagler ( I thought he lost but O well) Henry Armstrong Obviously, Pacquaio for fighting the best at both divsions and a few others like RJJ but there are quite a few to name but some that go up and fight the weak link the the division should get credit for beating a top fighter but not for being True multiple world title holder

    Comment


      #3
      how about holyfeild?
      sweet pea?

      Comment


        #4
        Going from the present to the past 20 years.

        Mayweather 130, 135, 147
        Toney 160, 200
        Hopkins 160, maybe175 (depending who you recognize in the late 90s: Jones or DM)
        Tito 147, 154
        Oscar 140, 147, 154
        Pacman 112, 126
        Holyfield 190, HW
        Pea 135, 147
        JCC 135, 140

        I cant think of anyone else in the recent past off the top of my head (and I am sure Roy Jones should not be in that list).

        from the past
        leonard (47,54,60), gomex (22, 30), benitez (40,47), arguello (26,35), duran (35,47), griffith (47,54), benvenuti(54, 60), tiger (60,75), jofre (18,26), ortiz (35,40), basilio (47,60) robinson(47,60), armstrong(26,35,47), canzoneri (26,35,40), ross(35,40,47)... I am sure I am already forgetting someone or making mistakes at this point, so I will stop here.
        Last edited by wmute; 10-18-2007, 07:56 PM. Reason: forgot Gomez and Benitez

        Comment


          #5
          Tito actually wasn't lineal at 54; Castillejo was. And Toney wasn't the champ at 200 because Jirov never fought Gomez (and Gomez at cruiser was better than Jirov by a hair or five). Otherwise, good stuff.

          Jones was never the lineal champ at any weight class. He was arguably the best at 60, 68 and 75 though when he was there.

          Comment


            #6
            alexis arguello duran carlos ortiz.

            Comment


              #7
              I don't know if I'm alone or not, but to me going up in weight just to get a belt isn't all the significant. I'm not downplaying anyone's accomplishments I just don't think they should mentioned along side the true, multi-division world champions like they are.

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP