I'm confused with this ****. I saw that ***** lost quite a few, maybe more than half, but people are saying that's actually really good for him and bad for the **********s because a sitting President is supposed to do even worse? Is that right?
Let me work this out as an analogy and see if this is how it plays out. And, unexpectedly, I'll use the topic of bumming.
So it's like 100 people queue up to bum you. And then a year or so later about 60-70 of them go "That was the worst bumming I've ever had, I'll have a bumming off someone else next time."
But in this case, only about 50-51 said it was a crap bumming. But then someone says to you "That's actually GOOD, because that must mean some liked it. Even though they're still less than half."
Is that about it?
It's bloody confusing being a Fat Yank, ain't it?
Let me work this out as an analogy and see if this is how it plays out. And, unexpectedly, I'll use the topic of bumming.
So it's like 100 people queue up to bum you. And then a year or so later about 60-70 of them go "That was the worst bumming I've ever had, I'll have a bumming off someone else next time."
But in this case, only about 50-51 said it was a crap bumming. But then someone says to you "That's actually GOOD, because that must mean some liked it. Even though they're still less than half."
Is that about it?
It's bloody confusing being a Fat Yank, ain't it?
Comment