[REAL TALK] Jose Manriquez, Denver Police Officer Left PARALYZED After Mandatory COVID-19, IGNORED By Mainstream Media

[Combat Talk Radio]

Go ahead, call it a hoax.

I'd share some news sources but you'll just call them conspiracy sites, so I'll let you read the story directly from his family.

Mainstream media refuses to shed light on this issue and force research into why this happened.

[iamboxing]

Make me really question my belief in the vaccine. Might not even get it now. I don't believe it should have been mandated anyway before this video, and everyone's health history should be taken into consideration - a sweeping mandate requiring everyone to vaccinate is dangerous.

[iamboxing]

Strangely, I could only locate the original news clip from Fox and typing Jose Manriquez into YouTube doesn't come up with the news clip. Very telling.

[Split Decision]

Lmao U need Ur own covid conspiracy master thread

[saopaulo]

Lmao U need Ur own covid conspiracy master thread

how is this funny? your a weirdo this guy poasted a credible topic and u utter out the typical braindead parroted about a conspiracy.

[Combat Talk Radio]

Strangely, I could only locate the original news clip from Fox and typing Jose Manriquez into YouTube doesn't come up with the news clip. Very telling.

I found it on GatewayPundit - but realized that the Lounge would just bash the site, and they hate Fox News.

I'm not new to the game.

[GrandpaBernard]

Don’t forget Big pharma profits by having governments make you take this risk

[Split Decision]

how is this funny? your a weirdo this guy poasted a credible topic and u utter out the typical braindead parroted about a conspiracy.

Lmao parroting conspiracies

that's all u idiots do on here daily like a dog with a bone lmao

Muh conspiracy is important dont laugh hurr dur lol

[Robbie Barrett]

The vaccine made me fly like superman, make a thread about me. No proof needed.

[iamboxing]

Lmao parroting conspiracies

that's all u idiots do on here daily like a dog with a bone lmao

Muh conspiracy is important dont laugh hurr dur lol

I think there's been so much conspiracies around this topic that when a genuine article is posted you assume it's made up.But you should always check up on stories. For instance, it's on Yahoo News, Fox News and the guy has a GoFundMe page.

Interestingly, Google has hidden some results:

Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe.

I think the powers that be are trying to hide this story. For example, DuckDuckGo and Bing show a few more links than Google does. I'm not implying Google made this decision but a request was made by an organisation to hide this information under the European "Right To Be Forgotten" law. Now I ask you this. Why? Is the material harmful, explicit or slanderous?

Here's Google's implementation policy and also you'll notice a request form which anyone can fill and request a search result be removed:

The recent has profound consequences for search engines in Europe. The court found that certain users have the right to ask search engines like Google to remove results for queries that include the person's name. To qualify, the results shown would need to be inadequate, irrelevant, no longer relevant, or excessive.

Since this ruling was published on 13 May 2014, we've been working around the clock to comply. This is a complicated process because we need to assess each individual request and balance the rights of the individual to control his or her personal data with the public's right to know and distribute information.

If you have a removal request, please fill out this . You'll receive an automatic reply confirming that we have received your request. We will then assess your case – please note that this may take some time because we have already received many such requests. In evaluating your request, we will look at whether the results include outdated information about your private life. We'll also look at whether there's a public interest in the information remaining in our search results – for example, if it relates to financial scams, professional malpractice, criminal convictions or your public conduct as a government official (elected or unelected). These are difficult judgements and as a private organisation, we may not be in a good position to decide on your case. If you disagree with our decision you can contact your local DPA.