Hahaha what the *** is going on in the first two photos. Gangnam style first pic and gay pirate pacman on the prowl in second photo look like hes looking for Bent victims.
So you are just going to quote me and ignore half of what it saying?
Ignore the part about still opening a case even when the origin is not identified? #14? Lol
Did you read my post thoroughly?
Or are you just piecing together partial facts to support your opinion? We both know you have a history of partially quoting articles.
That's your problem. Try this instead: read facts and information then form an educated opinion. right now you have it backwards.
Go re-read my post and think about your response. Its been almost 2 years, might as well take another year learning about ABP. Lol.
So now you want to keep my in suspense? What are you talking about?
That 3 experts will review the data and vote on if they think its likely doping, not doping? And? What is your point?
When you do as an example, microdose. You are more than likely below the amount to trigger a positive result. THAT IS THE POINT OF MICRO-DOSING!!!
Some may risk it a bit and come up with a "su****ious" sample. Then the "experts" review and either they have or do not have sufficient evidence. With microdosing, they often cannot go any further and call it a day.
If su****ious, the request is to have the athlete tested more often.
So now you want to keep my in suspense? What are you talking about?
That 3 experts will review the data and vote on if they think its likely doping, not doping? And? What is your point?
When you do as an example, microdose. You are more than likely below the amount to trigger a positive result. THAT IS THE POINT OF MICRO-DOSING!!!
Some may risk it a bit and come up with a "su****ious" sample. Then the "experts" review and either they have or do not have sufficient evidence. With microdosing, they often cannot go any further and call it a day.
If su****ious, the request is to have the athlete tested more often.
You claimed that CIR test can be beat (for no other purposes than to support your opinion that Floyd uses PEDS) by using plant/animal based testosterone.
This statement may be true for CIR by itself, but I'm not a scientist so I don't know. Nor will I pretend to be one to validate my own opinion and contradict your expertise.
HOWEVER:
I pointed out to you within WADAAthlete Biological Passport procedures for WADA labs - there is a specific protocol labs will follow in the event the CIR can not detect the origin of the testosterone.
As you should know by now, the purpose for ABP is to bring forth doping violations without actually finding the dope. I PROVIDED you EXACT procedures for your example and you keep ignoring the post.
Instead of acknowledging these facts that you were obviously unaware of you decided to
- ignore ABP altogether
- claim Microdosing
- imply people will not do their job
- ramble on with your speculative BS about how the process works
- belittle target testing
Smh. You're so full of shlt.
FYI Microdosing is done to avoid target testing. Just like Dr Gerard (WADA TUEC) pointed out to you in the audio link YOU PROVIDED - this is more information you ignore - today's labs can find a "cup of sugar in a swimming pool". He then went on and explained to you that Microdosing at undetectable levels would have a "placebo effect".
Still think you can use a whizzinator to beat ABP?
Better yet, does VADA do any type of longitudinal testing? I know Thomas Hauser said VADA is a great bargain for the fighters to save money and all - but how would VADA handle candy yam flavored testosterone gummy bears?
Comment