Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fighters Whose, Losses Were Only Against ATG Fighters?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by The Guru_ View Post
    Poster above is a snitch. :1point:

    On topic: The one, the only, The Fighting Pride Of Manchester, The Manchester Mexican - Ricardo El Hatton
    Dude. Worrying about whose a snitch or a narc is what grade-schoolers do. Have your balls even dropped yet?

    Poet

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
      Dude. Worrying about whose a snitch or a narc is what grade-schoolers do. Have your balls even dropped yet?

      Poet
      Snitches get stitches. :1point:

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by The Guru_ View Post
        Snitches get stitches. :1point:
        And grade-schoolers get grounded. Let me know when you're an adult.

        Poet

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by T3dBundy View Post
          he deserves to be an ATG for beating prime joe louis
          That's a circular argument. :-)

          If so anybody who beats an ATG would become an ATG himself.

          I don't rate Schmelling as high as some. I struggle to place him as an ATG. That's not to say that he was a bum - he was the Heavyweight Champion of the world in time with only one belt - but there is a big difference between ATG and bum.

          I think he's rated higher than he would otherwise be because of the hype and circumstances leading to Louis-Schmelling II.

          I guess it all boils down to what you call an ATG. Were all champions in the one-belt era ATGs? No. Braddock wasn't. Sharkey wasn't -- all might-have-beens and should-have-beens aside.

          Aside from the hype leading up to his second Louis fight I don't think he would be remembered any more than Braddock, Primo, or Sharkey are.

          Comment


            #35
            Schmeling rates higher p4p than he does at Heavyweight. I rate him among the 150 best fighters of all time.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

              No son, I asdmitted I was wrong on both counts. Go back and look up the post history and stop trying to rewrite it. As far as the rest of this post.....lol....whats next, PMing me pictures of Louis getting knocked out?



              Those pictures were sent as replies,usually after you had handed out some silly little infraction.


              I never went out of my way to message you.







              Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
              Maybe he can get some green off some of his alts.....no wait: They're all red too

              Poet



              I believe this argument has been settled already.You were given your chance and you copped out as usual.You failed to list these Alts of mine,instead listing previous dead accounts of mine which are no longer active.



              Stick to the online chess,buddy.Perhaps you can meet some sad broad who's willing to give up any aspirations to stay indoors with you for the rest of her life.








              Originally posted by Obama View Post
              Schmeling rates higher p4p than he does at Heavyweight. I rate him among the 150 best fighters of all time.



              And yet,nobody really cares.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by gimmeyapudpud View Post
                I believe this argument has been settled already.You were given your chance and you copped out as usual.You failed to list these Alts of mine,instead listing previous dead accounts of mine which are no longer active.
                Try being truthful: They aren't "dead" accounts they are BANNED accounts. Hence all subsequent accounts that you have cooked up are alts designed to sneak around your well earned ban.


                Originally posted by gimmeyapudpud View Post
                Stick to the online chess,buddy.
                While I realize with your 65 IQ Chess requires more brain power than you're capable of generating; I really think you should stick to commenting on subjects you're actually qualified to speak on ie. scrubbing terlits, licking windows, riding short-buses, digging ditches ect.

                Poet

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
                  Try being truthful: They aren't "dead" accounts they are BANNED accounts. Hence all subsequent accounts that you have cooked up are alts designed to sneak around your well earned ban.


                  There really isn't a difference,is there fatboy?

                  They've been dead since they were banned.They certainly haven't been active since then.


                  All these other accounts came about after cowards like you reported me time after time in an attempt to get rid of me.






                  Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
                  While I realize with your 65 IQ Chess requires more brain power than you're capable of generating; I really think you should stick to commenting on subjects you're actually qualified to speak on ie. scrubbing terlits, licking windows, riding short-buses, digging ditches ect.

                  Poet


                  Taking shots at the employed now are we? You aren't satisfied enough that you're unemployed and live at home with your parents,have to take shots at those who aren't lazy middle aged men who spend all day playing online chess

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP