Tony Zale V **** Tiger?

[Ivich]

Tony Zale, the left hooking body puncher par excellence,versus the immoveable object **** Tiger.
Both men excelled at close quarter head to toe warfare but were vulnerable to fleet footed boxers.
Here they meet an opponent who will not run.

Who comes out on top?

[IronDanHamza]

Not a comparison.

Tiger wins 10 times out of 10.

[The Old LefHook]

10 out of 10? What was Zale, chopped liver?

[IronDanHamza]

10 out of 10? What was Zale, chopped liver?

Decent fighter but he's not on Tiger's level.

[QueensburyRules]

Not a comparison.

Tiger wins 10 times out of 10.

- - 10*10 = 100x

Neither a legit comparison.

They already fought a trilogy in Valhalla. Alas, U never destined to see it, but REJOICE!

l'l floydy recently outclassed Dangerous Donny!

[markusmod]

Not a comparison.

Tiger wins 10 times out of 10.

I have him winning 9.5 out of 10 times.

[Ivich]

Not a comparison.

Tiger wins 10 times out of 10.

I have to take issue with this.

[IronDanHamza]

I have to take issue with this.

Why?

Are we acting like Tony Zale is some kind of all time great?

What makes you think he has any kind of chance with Tiger who’s superior in basically every area?

[Anthony342]

I have to take issue with this.

That guy's got issues.

[Ivich]

Why?

Are we acting like Tony Zale is some kind of all time great?

What makes you think he has any kind of chance with Tiger who’s superior in basically every area?

Zale would probably make most top 15s at 160lbs.The idea that Tiger would simply brush him aside does not sit well with me,I think Tiger was the better man but its certainly not a given he could white wash Zale 10 times in a row,that statement smacks of agenda to me.