Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NSB Pick 'em #2 - Oleksandr Usyk vs Mairis Briedis, Jan 27

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    NSB Pick 'em #2 - Oleksandr Usyk vs Mairis Briedis, Jan 27

    BETTING ODDS: The books have Usyk 5.5/1 to 10/1 to win, averaging around 7/1. Briedis picks receive a 1.75X multiplier.

    You only need to post in this thread to indicate if you'd like to use one of your 2X or 3X multipliers. EG.
    BrometheusBob.,2X
    If you are using no multiplier (1X), and not picking a draw, just voting in the poll puts you in. I will assume you want 1X unless you post otherwise.

    NOTES:
    -Draws are worth 120pts. A perfect pick without a multiplier is 30pts.

    -CLOSE is <12 pts difference, or anything closer than 116-112 on all three scorecards. WIDE is >=12 pts difference, or anything equivalent to 116-112 on all three cards or wider.

    -If you'd like to change your pick before the fight starts, post in this thread to do so. Ideally tag me so that I don't miss it.

    -2X doubles your points and 3X triples your points. Everyone starts with 5 doubles and 3 triples to use throughout the year. If you forget how many you have left, check the leaderboard in the master thread.

    Sticky me -MEGA-
    102
    Usyk by Close Decision
    25.49%
    26
    Usyk by Wide Decision
    44.12%
    45
    Usyk by KO 1-4
    0.98%
    1
    Usyk by KO 5-8
    9.80%
    10
    Usyk by KO 9-12
    17.65%
    18
    Briedis by Close Decision
    0.98%
    1
    Briedis by Wide Decision
    0.00%
    0
    Briedis by KO 1-4
    0.00%
    0
    Briedis by KO 5-8
    0.98%
    1
    Briedis by KO 9-12
    0.00%
    0

    The poll is expired.


    #2
    3x my points on this one

    Comment


      #3
      Usyk by wide decision, 116-112, 117-111, something like that

      On the road to become undisputed !

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by DuckAdonis View Post
        Usyk by wide decision, 116-112, 117-111, something like that

        On the road to become undisputed !
        116 - 112 counts as 'close' for the purposes of the Pick 'em. Just sayin', man.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Koba-Grozny View Post
          116 - 112 counts as 'close' for the purposes of the Pick 'em. Just sayin', man.
          >
          "WIDE is >=12 pts difference, or anything equivalent to 116-112 on all three cards or wider."


          This is what it says in the op, so on all 3 scorecards 116-112 is wide right ?

          Comment


            #6
            3X for Usyk by close decision

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by DuckAdonis View Post
              >
              "WIDE is >=12 pts difference, or anything equivalent to 116-112 on all three cards or wider."


              This is what it says in the op, so on all 3 scorecards 116-112 is wide right ?
              Oooops - my bad. Yeah, you're right... I misread the >= as just >. Which is a shame because 116 - 112 is pretty much the exact result I had in mind. Hmmm. I'll have to give it some thought but might have to change my pick to wide.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by DuckAdonis View Post
                >
                "WIDE is >=12 pts difference, or anything equivalent to 116-112 on all three cards or wider."


                This is what it says in the op, so on all 3 scorecards 116-112 is wide right ?
                Originally posted by Koba-Grozny View Post
                116 - 112 counts as 'close' for the purposes of the Pick 'em. Just sayin', man.
                Originally posted by DuckAdonis View Post
                Usyk by wide decision, 116-112, 117-111, something like that

                On the road to become undisputed !
                I changed it from last year. 116-112 on all three cards, or the equivalent (aka net score difference of 12 pts), is now wide.
                Last edited by BrometheusBob.; 01-22-2018, 12:33 PM.

                Comment


                  #9
                  usyk wide X2 multiplier.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I’ve gone for Usyk by wide decision but the fact that it’s in Latvia could mean the judges are favourable to Breidis.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP