I think that SHERK won first two rounds!
They always make big deal of takedowns and he get takedowns in round 2.
They always make big deal of takedowns and he get takedowns in round 2.
-
-
**** out of here Sherk did nothing but hug and pray for 75 percent of the time. Besides the one good elbow that he cut Dunham with he was out stricked and almost submitted numerous times. Dunham was robbed!
-
Originally posted by BoxingTech718 View Post**** out of here Sherk did nothing but hug and pray for 75 percent of the time. Besides the one good elbow that he cut Dunham with he was out stricked and almost submitted numerous times. Dunham was robbed!
He just got 5+ take downs and judges always make big deal out of it.
Judges were right,Sherk won clearly.Comment
-
i had it 2-1 for sherk
it was an ok fight IMOComment
-
I watched it this morning with the sound off (Gf was asleep
)
It looked like Sherk tapped on the way down in one of the gullotines, did that get mentioned? I'm probably wrong.Last edited by Mersey; 09-26-2010, 12:52 PM.Comment
-
-
If winning means he got the snott beat out of him but managed to take a guy down and lay on him without attempting a submission for most of the time then he won. But Dunham was the one with the most sub attempts, the better harder strikes, and majority of strikes landed. Hell it even looked like Sherk tapped once or twice. That hug and pray **** needs to be penalized.Originally posted by CungLe View PostComment
-
Dana White: Dunham was robbed! ****in Judges!Comment
-
That is the worst decision I've seen since
Rua-Machida 1 and Beebe-Easton.
Gotta be ****ing kidding me
How the **** did ANYONE score two or three for Sherk?Comment
-
Originally posted by allenloki View Post
No one scored third round for Sherk.
But he good few takedowns in round 2 and you can make a good point of giving him that round and first round was clearly his.Comment
)
Comment