Why is Conservative talk radio such a thing but not *******..

[New England]

public radio is obviously *******, but it has much less of an agenda than conservative radio. public radio is mostly national and international news, not opinion based programming.

******* TV and conservative TV are guilty of the same thing. they're not news.

[STREET CLEANER]

As you see in this thread how ******** get so angry and start attacking right away. Unable to take criticism.

******** pull in so many wacky directions that they cannot get on the same page.

[Slip Stream]

Wrong on every count.

You'd know about a person if you asked them about themselves rather than just stereotyping them. but hey, some folks go to the source and educate themselves, while those like rely on stereotypes and false assumptions.



I can state my case in an adult manner. You cannot. Thus you have proven to have inferior intellect. Again, it is what it is.

The rest of your post is the usual fallacy you're known for, and again the false assumptions as well.

BTW, you didn't address the fact that Team D is just as bad as Team R when it comes to hyperbole, or that they fail at talk radio because they can't win open debates. I know it's tough for you to offer effective counter points, but at least try. I like a challenge, and guys who lower themselves to insults and name-calling within a post or two don't cut it.

Remember;

'When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.' -Socrates

When I look at your post sometimes I wonder if I should even take the time to answer them, you argue for the sake of arguing alone which means you have to be deliberately obtuse most of the time. Ask you about yourself? The posts you write aren't yours then and reflect nothing of what you believe? Based on your posts I can see you want to be thought of as some kind super astute debater but it just makes you look sort of like a dumb ass ****. When people try as hard as you do its obvious you're making up for a lack of something in your non-internet life, if you have one. But I guess everyone needs an outlet of some kind.

The strength of my case isn't based on how I present it, it's based on how many facts it contains. I understand it hurts your twat when I make puerile comments about you, I most assuredly do. You've got the weakest set of nuts I've ever seen but you still want to be taken seriously? Your feelings get hurt so easily I wonder if you're a Thai ******* on her period?

False equivalencies yet again, not the "GOP propaganda is just as bad as the *******'s" dude? The GOP literally needs an amazingly emotional and ****** constituency to remain successful. Their agenda is different therefore so are their selling points. The **** the GOP feeds their fateful is easily disproved but what these people want is a type of food consistent with their fears and lack of imagination. This is why the GOP tent can't expand and be as inclusive as the ******* tent. ******** and ********s are a party reacting to history while the GOP is becoming a forgotten part of it.

The GOP is very much a party fueled by unreasoning tribal politics.

Again, substitute '*******' for 'conservative' and your statement is still true.

After all, ******** have convinced the "******" (as your own guy Gruber referred to people like yourself) that they are standing up for the little guy and want equality, all while they rake in the dough and become 1%'ers despite never working real jobs. The Clintons didn't amass over $100 million dollars through hard work. No, they did it because they are opportunists who pray on the ****** and make tons of money.

However, I don't find it funny. I find it alarming when politicians can openly display such hypocrisy, yet fool so many like yourself into either not seeing the hypocrisy, or just not accepting the reality of it.

[Gods We Faked]

Because news is more entertaining when you're not hindered by facts. ******* media sensationalizes non issues while conservative media sensationalizes issues that don't even exist. I'm not a big fan of people just repeating my own thoughts back to me, I'd rather actually learn something.

[Gods We Faked]

As you see in this thread how ******** get so angry and start attacking right away. Unable to take criticism.

******** pull in so many wacky directions that they cannot get on the same page.

As opposed to just blindly following a specific ideology?

[STREET CLEANER]

[/B]

As opposed to just blindly following a specific ideology?

See here is another one. What is that ONE ideology? Please explain

[Hitman Hodgson]

People still listen to the radio in America?

[New England]

As you see in this thread how ******** get so angry and start attacking right away. Unable to take criticism.

******** pull in so many wacky directions that they cannot get on the same page.

god forbid somebody does something other than what a biased side of the media tells them



before you go on calling me a "*******," know that my politics are typically business friendly, if you even know what that means or how that kind of orientation affects the policies i support

[1bad65]

When I look at your post sometimes I wonder if I should even take the time to answer them, you argue for the sake of arguing alone which means you have to be deliberately obtuse most of the time.

Then that shows you aren't very intelligent nor educated. I debate as
I was taught. I prove my assertions, make effective counter-points in the proper manner, and demand others prove their assertions.

Nothing "obtuse" about debating in adult, proper manner, You're only upset because you've proven you lack the intellect to do the same.

Ask you about yourself? The posts you write aren't yours then and reflect nothing of what you believe?

Then you're not grasping simple English.

For example, you continue to try and lump me into a group I do belong to and assign views to me I do not hold. I've stated multiple times on here I'm a member of the Libertarian Party and you continue to say that I'm a **********. So I tried to make it simpler for you to grasp by suggesting you ask me direct questions about my views and what groups I identify with and/or belong to.

Based on your posts I can see you want to be thought of as some kind super astute debater but it just makes you look sort of like a dumb ass ****.

More ignorance, and I've explained this as well on this site! So what's your excuse for being ignorant of it?

I debate for the purpose of seeing if my beliefs can stand up to open debate. If they cannot, then I must change my views to views that can hold up in debate. Now take this debate. My beliefs are standing up with ease, as all my opponent has are insults and name-calling. And since those antics are actually a sign of concession by the person stooping to such antics, there is no question my beliefs have done fine in this instance.

I'm still waiting for an effective counter point. Despite you walls of text, that is always missing. Go figure.

When people try as hard as you do its obvious you're making up for a lack of something in your non-internet life, if you have one. But I guess everyone needs an outlet of some kind.

So now you've jumped from telling me what my own beliefs are and what groups I belong to psychoanalyzing me over the Internet. Ok....

And you're trying just as hard as I, as every time I respond to your post, you show up to respond to mine. So your expert diagnosis applies to yourself as well, correct?

The strength of my case isn't based on how I present it, it's based on how many facts it contains.

You haven't presented your case in the proper manner! You're not presenting facts, or even any counter-points. You're stooping to insults and name-calling. Thus you have a VERY weak case.

I've tried to actually help you remedy this, but as you've shown, learning basic concepts isn't so easy for you.

I understand it hurts your twat when I make puerile comments about you, I most assuredly do. You've got the weakest set of nuts I've ever seen but you still want to be taken seriously? Your feelings get hurt so easily I wonder if you're a Thai ******* on her period?

More insults, which only prove you have the mind of a petulant child.

Must suck to get so intellectually pummeled you have to resort to insults, including false ***ual slurs.

False equivalencies yet again, not the "GOP propaganda is just as bad as the *******'s" dude?

I actually showed that to be true. Keep up, and accept the fact your team is just as corrupt/greedy/etc as Team R. They both suck, and that's a reason why some folks like myself belong to neither. Now this is obviously something you can't grasp, as it requires the intellect to think deeper than simple binary (R or D) logic.

The GOP literally needs an amazingly emotional and ****** constituency to remain successful.

Not sure about that, but we know Team D does. The most loyal voting bloc, who vote Party lines at the highest percentage, are blacks. They vote about 97% for Team D. They are also the most uneducated voting bloc as evidenced by High School graduation numbers. They also have a commanding lead when it comes to children born out of wedlock (I believe it's around 70%!).

The **** the GOP feeds their fateful is easily disproved but what these people want is a type of food consistent with their fears and lack of imagination.

And this differs from Team D how?

So I await your almost inevitable post, but I predict it will chock full of a mixture of insults, fallacy, and D vs R talking points, but devoid of facts. Time will tell..

[1bad65]

People still listen to the radio in America?

Yes. Radios come in all our cars, and I'm pretty sure most (if not all) cars sold here are set up to receive satellite radio, though you must pay subscription fees. When I last test drove a car in 2011, it was a stripped Mustang GT. Even that stripped model had satellite radio, and the car came with 6 months of no fees for it. I'm pretty sure by now it's standard on all cars, but I'm not certain on that.