They are not used to denote a plural. The correct term would be "socks" and not "sock's" unless you were referring something belonging to a single sock. For example "The sock's pattern was of an argyle style".
One more lesson: When using a comma in a sentence it is customary to follow it with a space. That way the pause that the comma denotes is emphasized and your spell checker won't have a shit about it.
"The socks were wool, cotton and polyester."
Maybe now people won't automatically doubt your genius.
I have never seen anybody using a comma before "and". It's nonsensical.
So I believe you.
it is nonsensical. it's also not used in european english.
it's called a serial comma, and it's standard in academic and professional writing in the states. i don't care whether or not you believe me. i don't care whether or not the comma is necessary, either.
in my next sentence i'll show you a situation where it's unnecessary in american academic / professional writing:
writing to me is about the communicative process, and that gets bogged down when you're mired in the rules and semantics.
rules and semantics
peanut butter and jelly
etc
related clauses. no commas.
coats, books, and jesus.
writing to me is about the communicative process, and that gets bogged down when you're mired in the books, coats, and jesus.
Comment