‘Twitter Files’ released by Elon Musk detailing censorship and suppression of information at Twitter

[The Big Dunn]

You keep on ****ing that drum with the Russian collusion that has been debunk. A few bots that were found and intercepted don't hold weight like some would like.

Information suppression by the highest level is a big deal.

Where did I post anything about collusion? You’re being dishonest.

You’re illustrating my point. It rings hollow to elevate one form of interference while simultaneously trying to deny and/or lessen interference when it helps the candidate and party you support.

[STREET CLEANER]

Where did I post anything about collusion? You’re being dishonest.

You’re illustrating my point. It rings hollow to elevate one form of interference while simultaneously trying to deny and/or lessen interference when it helps the candidate and party you support.

You consistently say that there was Russian interference and a bunch of other things. Things that have gotten disproven but you keep bring up like it really interfered with the election. Now you are saying all these things to make me look like a blind supporter or a team member. Try harder.

[The Big Dunn]

You consistently say that there was Russian interference and a bunch of other things. Things that have gotten disproven but you keep bring up like it really interfered with the election. Now you are saying all these things to make me look like a blind supporter or a team member. Try harder.

Yes because the Bipartisan Senate report determined there was interference but no collusion.

When has interference been disproven?

I have never once said there was collusion since it was disproven. I also make sure to say interference (no collusion) when posting on the subject.

Im doing no such thing to make you look like anything.

I just think any poster that downplayed Russian interference now making this an issue has a credibility issue. I think that is a reasonable position.

[STREET CLEANER]

How this is not a bigger story is the question. Twitter testified numerous times that they don't censor or target certain groups but evidence shows they did.

[Offensive Wizardry]

How this is not a bigger story is the question. Twitter testified numerous times that they don't censor or target certain groups but evidence shows they did.

lol you have to ask?

because this story makes mainstream media and the ******** *******/progressives they represent look bad.

but you are correct, this should be a much bigger story. hell, nobody bothered to post this story on bscnene and a mod had to do it. there are many topics that make the msm and the ******** *******/progressives look bad that are never covered on msm and this site which is owned by the people who own cbs/viacom.

i dont think there's a thread on this site about the belanciaga child pedo ad.

it didnt use to be this way(in msm and this site)....


half the country doesnt care about major controversies if it involve their political/philosophical side. the sheer amount of blatant corruption done against ***** by the ********s and mainstream media is totally ignored because media has done a great job cultivating hate programming against *****.

-president ***** spying on *****?
-********s using entire federal agencies to wage wars on their political enemies?
-using social media to censor and downright destroy their political enemies? regular folks?
-making fake **** charges against SCOTUS?
-***** bob creamer to instigate violence at ***** rallies?
-cnn boss jeff zucker caught on audio instructing cnn to do nothing but ***** hate?
-instigate bogus controversy after bogus controversy that spur countless kangaroo courts and politicized investigations costing tax payers millions upon millions of dollars?

the list is endless and people dont care because hahaha its mean racist *****. let's get him while throwing the american constitution and basic law and order out the garbage.


i mean you literally had a criminal co conspirator of hunter ***** and joe ***** saying hey, i confess (tony bobulinski) and the mainsream media literally ignored him.

leslie stahl literally belittled a sitting president and claimed it was a fake story laughing her ass off.....

can you imagine if tony bobulinski was a con conspirator of ***** or any of *****'s sons?

think of the stories that msm gave light to that were pure bs:

-covington
-julie swetnick
-christine blasey ford
-***** russia bounty gate (called out by glenn greenwald as a CIA plant story)
-***** has dementia
-***** got peed on by russian **********s


the list is endless....

cnn literally gave a one on one sit down interview with thomas di massino, the guy who tried to attack then candidate ***** and had to be hauled off secret service...

can you imagine cnn or msnbc giving a one on one interview to a guy who tried to rush the stage and atttack a presidential candidate in hillary or *****?

[man down]

Dems want to know who his source is. Lol, they're pissed free speech is thriving on Twitter.

One of the journalists who reported on the Twitter files was called to testify before congress.

[man down]

Haha they're trying to get musk for releasing twitter files. It amazes me how far dems will go to try and suppress free speech.

Through her line of questioning, Rep. Sylvia Garcia reveals she doesn't know who @bariweiss is and proceeds to ask a rather...awkwardly worded question.

[jmrf4435]

I ****xking hate the left!!!

[man down]

Taibbi says the Twitter files are bigger than anything he's covered in his career, including the fallout from the 2008 financial crisis

[The Big Dunn]

man down desperately bumps this thread because Fox admits lying about stolen election.

You bro, you gonna admit you were wrong about that?