Gamespot thought that xbox360 has better graphics then PS3

[MolotoVSolution]

Fightnight was one of the first 360 games.

And it still beats PS3's fightnight, and they had a year to plan for this and test it out.

That's one thing that you just have to think about and laugh.

[SnoopySmurf]

Fightnight was one of the first 360 games.

And it still beats PS3's fightnight, and they had a year to plan for this and test it out.

That's one thing that you just have to think about and laugh.

Because it was ported! Ported games typically don't look that good on other systems because it was made from the ground up. Games usually take about 2 years to make. PS3 developers haven't had that much time. This is why launch titles are few and sucky.

[Jarlaxle]

Because it was ported! Ported games typically don't look that good on other systems because it was made from the ground up. Games usually take about 2 years to make. PS3 developers haven't had that much time. This is why launch titles are few and sucky.

Its only partially ported. The hardware is so different the only thing you can really port is the actual models and scenery which is what EA will almost always port. EA even tried to improve the graphics for the PS 3 and in some ways they did. The veins and the hair on the boxers were improved. The problem is the lighting was reduced and they got rid of motion blur which obviously means they didn’t port everything.

Also Gamespot is not pro Xbox.