Let's say you had someone who's boxed for years and put him into muay thai. Assuming he has solid technique/foundations, would you expect him to do just as good if not better than other muay thai practitioners if you gave him enough time to learn?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How much of an advantage would a boxer have in muay thai?
Collapse
-
Equal? Hell no. This isn't StreetFighterII. How would a boxer know how to deal with kicks, knees, the plum? Is a runner going to win a triathlon if he never rode a bike and can't swim?
Now, if a guy gets 5 years of boxing and then goes into Muay Thai, and fights guys of equal experience in MT, then obviously he has advantages from having trained in a combat sport longer.
-
an advantage a boxer might have is better footwork and punches.
but he is gonna have to learn MT techniques fast, cause the regular bobbing+weaving of boxing can have him catching knees,etc.
the stance is also gonna be a problem, along with having to unlearn all the muscle memory and habits that are disadvantageous to MT but necessary in boxing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by redd foxx View Postequal? Hell no. This isn't streetfighterii. How would a boxer know how to deal with kicks, knees, the plum? Is a runner going to win a triathlon if he never rode a bike and can't swim?
Now, if a guy gets 5 years of boxing and then goes into muay thai, and fights guys of equal experience in mt, then obviously he has advantages from having trained in a combat sport longer.
in kickboxing (karate) in the early days boxing was so much more effective than karate that they forced it in teh rules for ppl to throw a kick
muay thai alone vs boxing alone and muay thai wins tho
Comment
-
Originally posted by Journeyman View Postan advantage a boxer might have is better footwork and punches.
but he is gonna have to learn MT techniques fast, cause the regular bobbing+weaving of boxing can have him catching knees,etc.
the stance is also gonna be a problem, along with having to unlearn all the muscle memory and habits that are disadvantageous to MT but necessary in boxing.
if you converted sanda would be a better choice more compatible with boxing fundamentals
Comment
-
Originally posted by HtotheZ View PostLet's say you had someone who's boxed for years and put him into muay thai. Assuming he has solid technique/foundations, would you expect him to do just as good if not better than other muay thai practitioners if you gave him enough time to learn?
#2 advantage better balance
My boys train out of a UFC gym but only box, occasionally they take a muay thai class (for the exercise) and spar kids of their same size and experience (boxing vs muay thai). My kids ability to laterally move & foot placement is completely evident but at the same time its their downfall because they get kicked in their lead leg a lot when they try to sit down on their punches. But when they punch on the fly, Muay thai fighters fight very square so jabs to the chest knock them back.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlexKid View Postthis guy is an idiot, it won rammon dekkers the first ever title held by a foreneir, and all thais have learnt alot of western boxing and a counter western boxing game, because its so effective
in kickboxing (karate) in the early days boxing was so much more effective than karate that they forced it in teh rules for ppl to throw a kick
muay thai alone vs boxing alone and muay thai wins tho
Comment
-
There's a learning curve when you transition to another art. Things that worked well in that previous system might not translate well to the new. With a boxer they will have to recalibrate some things to do well in Muay Thai. How well they integrate previous techniques into the new ones will tell the story of whether that previous knowledge is a stepstool, or a stumbling block.
Comment
Comment