Comments Thread For: Fury: Wilder Will Never Get a Shot at Me For What He's Said

[REDEEMER]

Wilder made accusations on social media.
Unless Fury decides to litigate, then that's as far as
it will go. Just another social media rant.
People talk **** on social media all the time,
There is no Instagram police department.

If Fury decided to take Wilder to court, that means
Fury becomes the accuser. Accusing Wilder of slander
in a court of law. To even have your case heard, you
will need to present your case, with evidence that
you have indeed been slandered.

If this DID make it to trial, it would be a civil case,
not a criminal case. That means that Wilder would not
have to show proof, beyond a reasonable doubt, that
he is not lying about Fury, he would only have to show
a 'preponderance of evidence'. Wilder cannot prove
that Fury cheated in a Criminal case, but he may have
enough to get off a civil slander case initiated by Fury.

Similar to how OJ Simpson was found not guilty in
his criminal trial, but he was found guilty in his
following civil trial, both over the same crime.

This is all nonsense. The proof is social media and video of his rants about an hour long on you tube ,why would Fury have to prove it ? That’s beyond ****** . Not only will they look at that but they will look at how extensive the views got ,which could easily prove it effects Furys standings in boxing ,he se effecting his financial situation by easily using an argument of opposition may not want to fight him now ,easy case to throw at Wilder .


A public figure can file for defamation of character . A commission figure has already made a statement about it and said legal action can be taking for his comments by slandering them because they are also being dragged into his warped view,do you think they are lying ? Ha

[kafkod]

You can't take somebody to court without making a
case and presenting your evidence of wrongdoing.
The onus is on the plantif to present some kind of
evidence before the case will even be heard.

Donald ***** is trying that right now,
and his cases are largely being thrown out of court
because he has no tangible evidence of wrongdoing.

And as far as the boxing commissions go,
it's ridiculous to portray them as infallible pillars of
virtue who are never accused of bias or ineptitude.
Many fighters and trainers have gotten away with
some form of cheating. Furthermore, even some of
the high-profile people who were caught cheating
were NOT caught by the commission themselves.
When Naazim Richardson called out both Trinidad
AND Margarito for having illegal wraps, it was while
their hands were being wrapped right in front of
commission officials!

Checkmate.

Fury doesn't have to prove that Wilder accused him of loading his gloves .. the proof is right there, in Wilder's own words.

The question the court will ask is ... "Mr Wilder do you have any evidence to justify your accusation?"

Wilder must then prove that he has justifiable, reasonable grounds for making that accusation.

Btw, who do you think is going to stop crying about cheating and accept his defeat first .. Trunp or Wilder?

[kafkod]

Exactly! When Mayweather (the initial accuser) accused Pac of using PEDS, Pac did not have to prove he wasn't, Mayweather had to prove he was, and didn't, and Pac won, received over $100,000 and the Mayweather's are lucky it wasn't more money, and Mayweather Jr, Roger Mayweather, and Mayweather Sr had to put out a formal apology regarding the accusations.

Facts. And Wilder has no proof or evidence of wrong doing by Fury,

The only defence he could put up if Fury sued him would be to try claiming that he didn't intend to defame, he was just trash talking to sell the fight, or something along those lines.

[richardt]

Facts. And Wilder has no proof or evidence of wrong doing by Fury,

The only defence he could put up if Fury sued him would be to try claiming that he didn't intend to defame, he was just trash talking to sell the fight, or something along those lines.

Exactly.....and then Wilder's attacks on Breland would bring serious questions as to Wilder's motivation behind also attacking Breland since those attacks were not trash-talking or fight-building in nature.

[Lemonhead_Jeff]

Are you a troll, or just dumb as ***? Mayweather and Wilder made PUBLIC statements about Pac and Fury that were slanderous. Mayweather failed to prove Pac was taking PEDS. If Fury wants to pursue by filing in court a defamation of character lawsuit, it is Wilder who will have the burden of proof, just like Mayweather did. Same with Breland, it is Wilder who will have to prove there was something in the water. Get a clue if you have to beg, borrow, or steal one.

Listen, like I said to the other fool, stick to boxing not law.
Mayweather and Pacquiao have nothing to do with this!
Try to focus your pea-brain for a minute.
This is the last free legal education you going to get from
me. You would owe a lawyer a fortune for everything I
have been explaining to you for free.

The burden of proof is not very high in a civil case,
you only have to show preponderance of evidence,
not absolute proof.
Now also consider that the defendant has a right to
file a counter-suit.
In a civil case, Wilder may be able to show enough
evidence to warrant his belief that Fury cheated.
If Wilder filed a counter-suit, Fury could be the one
opening his wallet.

If Fury DID cheat, he has already gotten away with it,
so it would be foolish to invite scrutiny in a court of law.

That's the reason he won't take Wilder to court.
Nobody on the jury will have heard of either of them.
There won't be any Fury fans or Wilder haters, just
people who want to know why Fury's gloves are floppy,
and why photo's show Fury's knuckles visible through
the laces on the wrist of his glove. Wilder's Lawyers
will establish Fury's questionable history, having been
previously caught with a 'damaged' glove before his
2015 win against Christian Hammer, and his issues with
the BBBoC.

Fury has a better chance of beating Wilder in the ring
than in a American civil courtroom.

Now go to sleep, you sheep!

[richardt]

Listen, like I said to the other fool, stick to boxing not law.
Mayweather and Pacquiao have nothing to do with this!
Try to focus your pea-brain for a minute.
This is the last free legal education you going to get from
me. You would owe a lawyer a fortune for everything I
have been explaining to you for free.

The burden of proof is not very high in a civil case,
you only have to show preponderance of evidence,
not absolute proof.
Now also consider that the defendant has a right to
file a counter-suit.
In a civil case, Wilder may be able to show enough
evidence to warrant his belief that Fury cheated.
If Wilder filed a counter-suit, Fury could be the one
opening his wallet.

If Fury DID cheat, he has already gotten away with it,
so it would be foolish to invite scrutiny in a court of law.

That's the reason he won't take Wilder to court.
Nobody on the jury will have heard of either of them.
There won't be any Fury fans or Wilder haters, just
people who want to know why Fury's gloves are floppy,
and why photo's show Fury's knuckles visible through
the laces on the wrist of his glove. Wilder's Lawyers
will establish Fury's questionable history, having been
previously caught with a 'damaged' glove before his
2015 win against Christian Hammer, and his issues with
the BBBoC.

Fury has a better chance of beating Wilder in the ring
than in a American civil courtroom.

Now go to sleep, you sheep!

Listen SHT FOR BRAINS!! YOU are the one who used OJ Simpson which has NOTHING to do with this case, UNLIKE Mayweather and Pac that are clearly like this case. Dude, you have embarrassed the sht out of yourself here which can only mean that you are a glutton for embarrassment! And you had the nerve and ******ity to act like Social Media cannot be seen as an atmosphere for slander which shows just how ****ing ****** you are! The burden is on WILDER to prove that Fury is guilty and if he doesn't and Fury sues him, you can count on your lover Wilder paying a big price and don't expect Breland to sit on the sidelines after he was slandered too, idiot. Don't bother responding, I block mental midgets like you and won't have to deal with someone with an inferior IQ.

[richardt]

This is all nonsense. The proof is social media and video of his rants about an hour long on you tube ,why would Fury have to prove it ? That’s beyond ****** . Not only will they look at that but they will look at how extensive the views got ,which could easily prove it effects Furys standings in boxing ,he se effecting his financial situation by easily using an argument of opposition may not want to fight him now ,easy case to throw at Wilder .


A public figure can file for defamation of character . A commission figure has already made a statement about it and said legal action can be taking for his comments by slandering them because they are also being dragged into his warped view,do you think they are lying ? Ha

Lemonbrain Jeff seems to relish in pure, unbridled self-embarrassment. He is the laughing stock, village idiot on the month for trying to twist things and turn them inside out. Breland might come at Wilder too for defamation of character. Someone needs to stick a fork in that Lemonhead, he's done.

[Lemonhead_Jeff]

This is all nonsense. The proof is social media and video of his rants about an hour long on you tube ,why would Fury have to prove it ? That’s beyond ****** . Not only will they look at that but they will look at how extensive the views got ,which could easily prove it effects Furys standings in boxing ,he se effecting his financial situation by easily using an argument of opposition may not want to fight him now ,easy case to throw at Wilder .


A public figure can file for defamation of character . A commission figure has already made a statement about it and said legal action can be taking for his comments by slandering them because they are also being dragged into his warped view,do you think they are lying ? Ha

Stop disgracing the image of Hugh Beaumont.
He is rolling over in his grave, may he rest in peace.
You're as naive as the Beaver. Not the cute Beaver of
the early seasons. The dumb Beaver of the later seasons.
I'm Larry Mondello. You're Lumpy. Forget about it.

In fact, go change your photo to Gomer Pyle!

[jmrf4435]

no a big deal

Fury beat him twice easily

[Lemonhead_Jeff]

Lemonbrain Jeff seems to relish in pure, unbridled self-embarrassment. He is the laughing stock, village idiot on the month for trying to twist things and turn them inside out. Breland might come at Wilder too for defamation of character. Someone needs to stick a fork in that Lemonhead, he's done.

Don't change the subject, richard t-girl,
this is not about Breland. Breland has a much better
chance of beating Wilder in civil court than Fury does.

Arguing with ******ed people is only interesting for a very
brief time, so I'm going to jet and let you mongoloid Fury
fanboys give each other wrap-arounds in peace.

..pitiful.