Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
    What's hilarious is it's not just Golovkin they give his opponents credit for imaginary wins.



    Like this right here. His resume is so pathetic. Golovkin is a fantasy fighter, nothing more. The Golovkin his fans talk about, doesn't exist.
    His record is great. You are the hater who is pathetic. You don't judge boxers on real results. You just pick the boxers you like and overrated the hell out of them and take the boxers you hate and trash the hell out of them no matter how good their record is. Your opinion is worthless because you cannot give credit to any boxer you dislike.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Htown-Finest View Post
      GGG resume ain’t bad. Ppl trolling

      GGG resume like RJJ. They was KO’ng MF’ers out. Available opponents perhaps weren’t it’s best but s*** I give both credit. Perhaps they had power and made it look easy
      Well said man...that's how I saw it as well...I think it was RJJ who said - 'I don't fight nobodies...I make em look like nobodies'

      GGG running through the 15 or so guys he did by KO is just really impressive imo...I give him credit for that...I don't subscribe to calling guys bums just because they get KOd.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by boliodogs View Post
        His record is great. You are the hater who is pathetic. You don't judge boxers on real results. You just pick the boxers you like and overrated the hell out of them and take the boxers you hate and trash the hell out of them no matter how good their record is. Your opinion is worthless because you cannot give credit to any boxer you dislike.
        It's you and other Golovkin fans that don't judge on real results, that's what this thread is about.

        Shoulda, woulda, coulda. Golovkin DIDN'T, his resume is crap.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
          It's you and other Golovkin fans that don't judge on real results, that's what this thread is about.

          Shoulda, woulda, coulda. Golovkin DIDN'T, his resume is crap.
          Why do you always get so emotional about GGG...That Joshua loss really did a number on you I think

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Boxing1013 View Post
            Why do you always get so emotional about GGG...That Joshua loss really did a number on you I think
            Please tell us how the Steve Weisfeld that scored Canelo the victor over Golovkin knows more about scoring fights than any fan. Fail of the year.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Boxing1013 View Post
              Well said man...that's how I saw it as well...I think it was RJJ who said - 'I don't fight nobodies...I make em look like nobodies'

              GGG running through the 15 or so guys he did by KO is just really impressive imo...I give him credit for that...I don't subscribe to calling guys bums just because they get KOd.
              RJJ resume > GGG resume tho.

              Comment


                #27
                Canelo undoubtedly has the better resume, but IMO easily has the most questionable decisions ive seen out of a top fighter ever.

                Lara should've lost
                GGG 1 should've lost
                GGG 2 should've lost

                Somehow got a draw scorecard against Floyd..

                I'm just talking about the clear ones. Some people even argue the Trout and Jacobs fights were razor close. I give those fights to canelo. But some of the scorecards make you scratch your head

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                  on the other thread..... Boxing1013 just stated that he does not see any real difference between Golovkin beating Murray and Lemieux, and Canelo beating Cotto and Lara

                  then..... he said that some of the killers on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo..... but he will not name which one
                  Dude I should sue you for slander ...but in all seriousness

                  I said that imo GGG stopping Lemieux and Murray in dominating fashion was more impressive than Canelo going 12 with an old shot fat Cotto (no disrespect to him...but that was not a prime Miguel Cotto)...and beating Lara 7-5.

                  Of those 4 wins I think it is reasonable to say the Lara win was the best...but GGG's wins were much more impressive against his opponents...and the truth is that those 4 guys are all roughly at the same level at the time of the fight vs their respective opponents.

                  I also already listed like 5 times the 6 guys who I felt Canelo wouldn't necessarily KO that GGG did...and I said imo one of those 6 very possibly could have beaten him...I also said I would probably favor Canelo in all 6 of those fights...but I think one or maybe more out of those 6 could have given him a really tough fight and could have won.

                  I mean it was just my opinion lol...I wasn't really slighting Canelo at all...but for some reason you really seem to take any critique of Canelo very very seriously lol...you are the UK's biggest Nelo fan

                  And btw just because I have an opinion about Nelo or GGG doesn't mean you have to get all in your feelings all the time...you and a few other guys get so emotional about them lol...it's not like you have to take the Canelo posters down in your house just because I think Canelo may have struggled in a match vs one of GGG's opponents...just breath it will be OK

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by Htown-Finest View Post
                    RJJ resume > GGG resume tho.
                    RJJ was great for sure...only issue for him imo was for all his greatness I hate that he ended up with too many losses for all of that talent...a lot of that was because he moved up in weight so much...but yeah RJJ was just an incredible talent and just really fearless too.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Boxing1013 View Post
                      Dude I should sue you for slander ...but in all seriousness

                      I said that imo GGG stopping Lemieux and Murray in dominating fashion was more impressive than Canelo going 12 with an old shot fat Cotto (no disrespect to him...but that was not a prime Miguel Cotto)...and beating Lara 7-5.

                      Of those 4 wins I think it is reasonable to say the Lara win was the best...but GGG's wins were much more impressive against his opponents...and the truth is that those 4 guys are all roughly at the same level at the time of the fight vs their respective opponents.

                      I also already listed like 5 times the 6 guys who I felt Canelo wouldn't necessarily KO that GGG did...and I said imo one of those 6 very possibly could have beaten him...I also said I would probably favor Canelo in all 6 of those fights...but I think one or maybe more out of those 6 could have given him a really tough fight and could have won.

                      I mean it was just my opinion lol...I wasn't really slighting Canelo at all...but for some reason you really seem to take any critique of Canelo very very seriously lol...you are the UK's biggest Nelo fan

                      And btw just because I have an opinion about Nelo or GGG doesn't mean you have to get all in your feelings all the time...you and a few other guys get so emotional about them lol...it's not like you have to take the Canelo posters down in your house just because I think Canelo may have struggled in a match vs one of GGG's opponents...just breath it will be OK
                      Deviating from post. Just saying unless they have common opponents its BS to assume .plus even common opponents its tricky because v it depend on where they were in their careers when they fought.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP