Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins???

[Boxing_1013]

we will never know because the bigger attraction, lil g who had hbo headlining him, never even made a move to try to make the fight

and it was logical and feasible...he was well known in the boxing community too..and headlined cards on premium and network tv

yet lil g preferred guys like dom wade and willie monroe

Yeah idk I just can't really see getting on GGG for that fight not happening tbh.

Wade was a mando so it was easy enough to do that fight and pocket the change and handle your business against a not very good guy.

I like Monroe though so I won't really slight him...I was always partial to southpaws who can box though so maybe that's why.

[Curt Henning]

Yeah idk I just can't really see getting on GGG for that fight not happening tbh.

Wade was a mando so it was easy enough to do that fight and pocket the change and handle your business against a not very good guy.

I like Monroe though so I won't really slight him...I was always partial to southpaws who can box though so maybe that's why.

of course you cant see getting "on him" even though getting on him is probably your wildest fantasy...you are a lil g apologist

lara was #1 rated at 154 at the time and actively calling for the fight......yet you have no problem with golovkin not trying to get the fight...LOL

[aboutfkntime]

the lara one alwaysssss cracks me up

before fighting jacobs and canelo lara would have made a ton of sense and would have beent he best notch on his resume.....its been explained how and why very logically....yet most of the muppets run around and say "lara? who cares...golovkin would have killed him and got no credit for it"...like thats a logical and sensible answer

team lil g flat out said he was nver on their radar because he brought no money or fans!!! thats laugh out loud funny....it says it all....it says "hes too risky and too tough to find...we like bums that are ready to get hit and hbo likes them for us as well"...LOL

BoxingMoron1013 thinks that Murray, Lemieux, and Monroe, were better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara, Cotto, and Trout, were for Canelo

he should be buried in a pile of his own faeces

[aboutfkntime]

Lara is probably my 2nd favorite fighter of this generation...I think he was great...but I don't think he was a much stiffer test att than Murray was for GGG att...I just don't.

I do think Lara would have taken the GGG fight at 160...but he had other similar money options at 154 so I don't think he really wanted to do it...and similar for GGG...great matchup if it could have happened but risk reward wise it made little sense for either guy.

you are an absolute moron !!

committing your ******ity to print..... for ALL to see

[aboutfkntime]

Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins???

forget GGG getting credit for imaginary wins.....

we got some moron running around here..... insisting that Murray, Lemieux, and Monroe, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara, Cotto, and Trout, were for Canelo.....

THAT'S WHAT's UP !!

[aboutfkntime]

son, have you gone too far again..... ?

like when you created a thread manipulating the words of Steve Weisfeld, to insinuate that Golovkin won the rematch..... while being blissfully unaware that Weisfeld was an official judge for that fight, and he scored the fight for Canelo..... ? loooool

have..... you..... gone..... too..... far..... again..... ? LMAO

[Boxing_1013]

of course you cant see getting "on him" even though getting on him is probably your wildest fantasy...you are a lil g apologist

lara was #1 rated at 154 at the time and actively calling for the fight......yet you have no problem with golovkin not trying to get the fight...LOL

Lol...dude I respect GGG and think he is great...but I don't really get my feelings tied up in any professional athlete lol...not trying to be rude but look at those on here who are getting emotional about GGG and Canelo.

And who are the ones just responding matter of factly...first ones are GGG dislikers and Canelo fans...2nd are GGG 'fans'...I would more consider myself an objective observer and GGG is objectively great imo.

Man...calling out a fighter who has good name recognition...I mean come on it is a smart business move...as I said I think he would have taken the fight...but did he send in a contract?

I would add as well that while I saw Canelo beat Lara...it is easier for Nelo to take on fights that will probably go 12 rounds for him...he could lose 8-4 in a fight and still win ya know...and not many guys would ever clearly beat him worse than 8-4.

Tbh if people who disliked GGG still acknowledged his clear wins vs Jacobs and Canelo...I would really want to see him in with all of these fantasy matchups you claim...and I still do honestly...but you and others have shown that he can clearly win a fight 8-4 and you will say he lost lol.

So I don't think you really want to see those fights to see good fights...you just want an opportunity for him to lose...and we just differ there...I want to see good fights.

[Larry the boss]

The 'more titles' and 'moving up' etc argument to me is just not one I really care about tbh...I am just looking at who you faced, when/where/how you faced them, and what you did...and based on that I think GGG clearly has one of the best resumes out right now...and unlike Nelo and Pac he also has no clear blemishes...Pac has some great wins though...and at 28 though Nelo still has some time to catch GGG's resume and I do think they are fairly close already, but I would rate GGG above right now.

Even that list you stated -

I never saw him beat GGG...I saw him lose twice...Cotto was not Cotto when he beat him ya know...Lara was a nice win...Trout a good win...Jacobs too...but he went 12 round with all of those guys.

But when you get to the second group you listed, how can you really say those guys are above what GGG did, and GGG did it imo more impressively and to more guys, on that similar level:

Kirkland a nice KO...Kirkland was also KOed in 1 round by Ishida...who GGG KOed in 3 rounds...and Ishida went 12 rounds with Paul Williams and Pirog...Ishida is about GGG's 15th best win btw...Angulo a good finish...Khan Chavez Mosley...Shane was not SSM when they fought...

I mean come on, now we're reaching...especially if you are trying to really slight GGG's resume...I appreciate you listing a top 10 though...I just think when someone actually writes it down...it makes you realize that Canelo's is not really past GGG's at all.

For GGG
Canelo
Jacobs
Murray
Lemieux
Monroe
Brook
Geale
Stevens
Macklin
Ouma

The last 8 guys on that list GGG stopped all of them very nicely...hardly losing a round...and then he has about another 7 guys who were at a similar level...Ishida Proksa Rubio Rosado Adama Rolls Vanes...who he just completely rolled through as well...idk I just have never really understood the pushback against GGG's resume...doesn't really make a ton of sense to me when I look at it, especially compared to his peers' resumes...just my 2 cents.

Canelo has faced and defeated far better comp then GGG, you listed the wins for GGG(he never beat Canelo stop making up wins) GGG's wins suck outside of Jacobs and Canelo beat him as well..some of the names you listed i dont even know why you bothered, they suck...GGG's resume is pure trash

[Gideon lock]

Pathetic thread you mention sturm etc but not the fact they actively ducked a prime golovkin.

[Boxing_1013]

you are an absolute moron !!

committing your ******ity to print..... for ALL to see

As much as I like Lara...who did he actually ever beat to be considered so indomitable in your eyes?

His best win on paper is Trout or Vanes you know