Looks like DAZN don't want none of Andrade either. They just gave Canelo & GGG some leeway to possibly avoid him a bit longer. Seems like his name has been thrown in for consideration just to try to force Kovalev or GGG 3. Dude has a belt & nobody seems to want it.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: DAZN Narrows Field For Canelo 9/14 Opponent Selection
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Brettcappe View PostFor me: 1st choice: GGG, 2nd: Kovalev, 3rd:Charlo, 4th: Andrade, 5th: Callum Smith. Out of those 5 there should be a deal worked out soon!
not even slightly interested in Golovkin or Kovalev
Golovkin does not deserve that payday, there are more deserving opponents currently holding titles that Golovkin has refused to fight..... and Kovalev is a fight from left-field that nobody wanted or even suggested
also, Kovalev campaigns 2 divisions north of Canelo.....
so there will probably be a catchweight, meaning that the result of that fight will likely create more questions than answers
Andrade/Charlo are the only fights I want..... because they are the only 2 belt-holders at 160, and they are the only real threats at 160
1: Andrade
2: Charlo
3: Golovkin/Smith/Kovalev
Golovkin, because the result will be delicious..... Smith, for some 168 credibility..... Kovalev, for a 175 trinket
truth be known I would prefer Andrade > Charlo > Smith > Benavidez..... with Smith/Benavidez happening at the FULL limit of 168
Comment
-
Originally posted by kushking View PostTell this lame he CLEARLY lost his bet with me. He expects someone to fish through his 4000 shltposts to try & find when he defended the rolls fight.(if he didn't delete them as before) But all I told him was he merely had to show that he hated on ggg facing the 117th ranked day laborer 1/1000th the amount he does on canelo for 10x better opponents. But all he can muster was an old ass post of him admitting to ggg ducking Ward,& 2 other 1 sentence long shltposts(exactly the amount & length posts I said hed have where he criticized ggg in any way shape or form). You truly can't make up this level of latent beastiality & sheer cowardis. Anyone whos read any of his posts knows 95% of all posts are hating Canelo yet he spent a long ass time while online to respond because he was trying to muster more than the measly semblance of holding ggg accountable. He should be banned for not paying up,butbwe know cowards like him will just continue playing ******.
I don't think he is one of those ret4rded Golovkin fans
he just uses G to bash Canelo
while admitting that G ducked Lara and Ward LMAO
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostThat was my take. And thats the one thing I disagree with GGG on with this fight. And if that is the issue I don't think DAZN should be making GGG on the 2 option list. GGG should be cool taking the fight on Canelo's f#cking ranch if thats where Canelo wants the fight to be. Beggars can't be choosers & while GGG has leverage he don't got THAT much leverage to demand the location.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postnot even slightly interested in Golovkin or Kovalev
Golovkin does not deserve that payday, there are more deserving opponents currently holding titles that Golovkin has refused to fight..... and Kovalev is a fight from left-field that nobody wanted or even suggested
also, Kovalev campaigns 2 divisions north of Canelo.....
so there will probably be a catchweight, meaning that the result of that fight will likely create more questions than answers
Andrade/Charlo are the only fights I want..... because they are the only 2 belt-holders at 160, and they are the only real threats at 160
1: Andrade
2: Charlo
3: Golovkin/Smith/Kovalev
Golovkin, because the result will be delicious..... Smith, for some 168 credibility..... Kovalev, for a 175 trinket
truth be known I would prefer Andrade > Charlo > Smith > Benavidez..... with Smith/Benavidez happening at the FULL limit of 168
Comment
-
I know one is PBC and the other Dazn. But in a perfect world, Andrade would fight Charlo. Neither one has proven jack s**t @ 160, and for either one to get a win over the other would go a long way toward proving themselves and becoming more marketable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View PostI don't think he is one of those ret4rded Golovkin fans
he just uses G to bash Canelo
while admitting that G ducked Lara and Ward LMAO
Why do they do these fanboi contradictions if they're not ggg stans?
GGG stans are some lowlife sons $#@$_&$
Comment
-
I find it highly su****ious that Canelo is dragging out a third fight with GGG, especially telling id it's based on the requirement that he only fight in his 'safety nest' of Vegas, where we all know he is likely to get the nod again.
Alvarez doesn't care as much about belts as long as there is one on the line. If he won't fight Andrade, Charlo is just unreachable at PBC, then FFS just fight Golovkin in September.
He is already past his prime, and if Alvarez drags it out even just another year or more - a win would be seriously tarnished as GGG would be closer to 40, and fans may even turn away in droves as a protest meaning DAZN doesn't look like making a profit.
With 10 fights to go, everyone knows the likelihood most of them will probably be at 168, catchweight and maybe 175. ( and I doubt GGG will move up until the end of his contract as he is a natural MW)
but if he wants respect, finish the business you started 3 friggin years ago. Fight or vacate do we can finally see some fights at 160 we've been waiting along time for.
Comment
Comment