Crawford and Spence are on a different level to Thurman

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Seriously. Every back and forth I've read on here is at least 85% about who people have fought and very little about breakdowns about how fighters match up right now and what strategies they should employ. It's like listening to Stephen A and Skip when they couldn't go one present day topic without talking about Jordan or Brett Favre. That resume argument is for comparing or rating an entire career, like when you're ranking best fighters of a decade or generation. I don't think how guys fared against uncommon opponents from 3+ years ago is going to be the deciding factor in any big time matchup.

Exactly, as I said to the first guy that brought resume up...
Resume doesn’t equate for talent.

[Bjl12]

You typed out all that just to have it come down to Thurmans resume is still better than Spence and Crawford combined.

You cant read.

Crawford has a better resume than Thurman - no question