Do you think Lomachenko did enough at 130 to be considered a top 10 ATG there? He beat Walters and Rigondeaux, and dominated everyone he fought at that weight.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Lomachenko top 10 ATG @ 130?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by VG_Addict View PostDo you think Lomachenko did enough at 130 to be considered a top 10 ATG there? He beat Walters and Rigondeaux, and dominated everyone he fought at that weight.
Walters is garbage and Rigondeaux had to move up two classes but Lomo won't move up two classes. A lot of gay men on this site, so weird!
-
-
-
Originally posted by McDonough View PostShut the fùck up you **** riding hoe. Jeesus fùcking Christ with you people!
Walters is garbage and Rigondeaux had to move up two classes but Lomo won't move up two classes. A lot of gay men on this site, so weird!
If you mean won't move up two weight classes as in won't move up two classes in one fight well very few fighters have done that recently.
Anyway he's not top 10 all-time at 130. He had too few fights there. I think that's a better answer than to get all angry and pissy with a dude for posing a question.
Comment
-
Originally posted by buddyr View Posthow is anyone top 10 in any weight class with only 5 fights there? hahaha.
130 is fairly deep though. Kid Chocolate, Flash Elorde, Alexis Arguello, Floyd Mayweather, Manny Pacquaio, Julio Cesar Chavez, Alfredo Escalera etc;
Comment
-
Originally posted by mcdonalds View PostSo he's top 10 because he beat Walters and rigondeaux? AKA a featherweight and a super bantamweight
He's never beaten a top 130 pounder
Walters also moved up to 130 before Lomachenko so one could argue Walters was beaten by a Featherweight in Lomachenko.
Comment
-
Comment