Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How to fix the Judging issues.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    On big TV fights they should have Live viewer scoring polls. At the end of the fight, if the judges are more than say 5 points out with their scoring compared to the public they should be suspended. First suspension 1 year, second suspension 3 years, third suspension Life.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by sparkz2112 View Post
      If you only score KDs, then Pacquiao vs Mosley would be scored a draw. I think you're on to something with the whole "remove the subjective" element, but I don't see how this exact idea helps. There's plenty of dominant fighters that take a flash KD while dominating a fight.
      The idea that a fighter "dominated" the other so he should be judged the winner is the type of subjectivity that needs to be eliminated to keep the outcome transparent and much, much harder to corrupt. I'm taking this approach from hockey which records shots on goal. This stat is often used by analysts in their SUBJECTIVE commentaries of the game. Still, team A might have out-shot team B by 50 to 10, but ultimately team B wins if it scored once and team A was shutout (e.g. team B has an all-star goalie).

      Yes, Pacquiao vs Mosley would've been a draw but that would be the case for hundreds of other fights in which neither fighter is willing to commit to an offense that ends in a KO, TKO, or builds towards a scored victory. A properly governed sport would implement a revenue structure to reward those fighters with higher number of wins.
      Last edited by THC; 10-21-2017, 12:57 PM.

      Comment


        #13
        A TV Monitor would certainly help. I also think a system where you have 5 judges instead of 3 and each one of them gives a round to one fighter- and at the end when the scores are collected, the fighter has only won the round if the majority (3 or more judges) scored it in favour of the particular fighter. This way a more complete score should be the result

        For example This system with 3 judges would have resulted in a 115-113 win for Golovkin against canelo

        But to have a more complete result it should be judged with 5 judges instead of 3
        Last edited by DuckAdonis; 10-21-2017, 01:10 PM.

        Comment


          #14
          Fix it by firing all the old clueless fux like Byrd and moretti, and a few others they always give chip fights to and actually implement a criteria of a hiring system because they hire their friends not professionally capable boxing experts.

          But of coarse the Nevada state boxing commission is built off incompetence and corruption so it would have to start with them being completely wiped out and having a national boxing commission.

          Comment


            #15
            the whole sport is corrupt. the corruption is built into it and it runs on corruption. nothing will be done because they dont want anything to be done. we all saw a guy low blow another and the ref pretended like it was a "ko" was anything done about it? woops we messed up, lets change it, or at least say we messed up...nope. we all saw byrd with her insane scorecard and that got so much backlash that they benched her "for a little while" at best they scapegoat the judges and refs but does that address any of the underlying corruption...no

            its like having a tie game in the super bowl, 1 second left. one team tries a field goal but it sails 20 yards wide...wait the refs say it was good??? now repeat that over and over for decades and decades and you got boxing. if people complain enough bench the refs for a couple games. that solved the problem!
            Last edited by daggum; 10-21-2017, 01:32 PM.

            Comment

            Working...
            X
            TOP