Why do the same posters who claim VADA is the best side with Wilders dirty foes?

[Shape up]

It does? Can you provide us with the proof? Thanks. That will surely clear some things up for us!

But if you can't provide it, will you admit that you straight up lied and pulled that from your a$s?

This directly contradicts your information:

Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons. This medical practice is prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval. WADA has justified the inclusion of IV infusions on the Prohibited List given the intent of some athletes to manipulate their plasma volume levels in order to mask the use of a prohibited substance and/or to distort the values in the Athlete Biological Passport. Further, it must be clearly stated that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild rehydration or help speed recovery is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific opinion to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice. Legitimate medical indications for IV infusions are well documented and are most commonly associated with medical emergencies (emergency TUE), in-patient care, surgery, or clinical investigations for diagnostic purposes.--------------------- notice where it says " THIS MEDICAL PRACTICE IS PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES WITHOUT PRIOR TUE APPROVAL. -------------- that's quite clearly worded ******NY------------------- now watch this---------

[Shape up]

JUST REHYDRATION he said hahahaha hahahaha

[Shape up]

its coming... get ready.. get ready for a half page reply with nothing but links copy and paste LOL..

Yep, he will call in his alt dumbconsumption soon to try and give him credit

[travestyny]

Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons. This medical practice is prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval. WADA has justified the inclusion of IV infusions on the Prohibited List given the intent of some athletes to manipulate their plasma volume levels in order to mask the use of a prohibited substance and/or to distort the values in the Athlete Biological Passport. Further, it must be clearly stated that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild rehydration or help speed recovery is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific opinion to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice. Legitimate medical indications for IV infusions are well documented and are most commonly associated with medical emergencies (emergency TUE), in-patient care, surgery, or clinical investigations for diagnostic purposes.--------------------- notice where it says " THIS MEDICAL PRACTICE IS PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES WITHOUT PRIOR TUE APPROVAL. -------------- that's quite clearly worded ******NY------------------- now watch this---------

You have no idea what the word "retroactive" means, do you?

[img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[Shape up]

This medical procedure is PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES------ means never allowed ------- without PRIOR------- that mean before-------TUE APPROVAL-------- approval means already organised, not 19 days afterwards, did you watch floyds video where even he said it was just dehydration, exactly what WADA said he is NOT able to do

[Ray*]

It doesn't matter which testing agency. They both use the same lab, so one isn't better than the other but i know which one is actually recognise by WADA.

[Ray*]

UFC has had their stars pop dirty with USADA left and right. US Olympians get caught by them constantly. The entire USADA vs VADA "controversy" is something boxing promoters cooked up because VADA is much more controllable and corruptible due to their dependence on boxing money.

Yeah i don't get the USADA v VADA thing with some posters on here. I know anything that involves Mayweather gets people blood pressure running but i don't mind either one of those testing agencies.

VADA is cheaper but for me USADA because they are the testing agency representing america/taxpayers they have more than just a moral quote.

VADA is a private company whilst USADA is funded by the taxpayers.

[travestyny]

This medical procedure is PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES------ means never allowed ------- without PRIOR------- that mean before-------TUE APPROVAL-------- approval means already organised, not 19 days afterwards, did you watch floyds video where even he said it was just dehydration, exactly what WADA said he is NOT able to do

Wow. Let me help you out, little guy.

retroactive |ˌretrōˈaktiv|
adjective
(especially of legislation) taking effect from a date in the past: a big retroactive tax increase.


The fact that you can't understand that is embarrassing. Furthermore, the fact that USADA had this case very publicized and were never placed under scrutiny by WADA proves that you have no idea what you are talking about. Perhaps if you understood what retroactive meant, you would have been able to keep up!

Now tell me...WHO THE **** WOULD EVER APPLY FOR AN IV A MONTH PRIOR TO HAVING THE IV. HAVE YOU EVER KNOWN YOU WERE GOING TO HAVE AN IV WEEKS BEFORE YOU HAD IT, YOU ****ING DOLT?!

6.0 TUE Application Process
6.1 An Athlete who needs a TUE should apply as soon as possible. For
substances prohibited In-Competition only, the Athlete should apply for a TUE at least 30 days before his/her next Competition, unless it is an emergency or exceptional situation.

Jesus Christ, you are a moron. Why the **** would it ever be the case that every athlete that needs an IV would be expected to know 30 days ahead of time????

Log the **** off!

[img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[N/A]

why did usada comply to keep the IV quiet, when Floyd didn't have a TUE for the next 19 days, also hadn't applied for it so that in itself is in excusable

You apparently have no idea how retroactive TUEs work.

USADA witnessed Floyd's condition, witnessed the IV, and took a sample from Floyd immediately before and immediately after the IV. USADA was notified that Floyd would be requesting a TUE.

A proper TUE request is carefully handled by doctors, lawyers, etc and the appropriate parties need time to meticulously put together the documents and accompanying evidence before making the official filing of their request.

19 days is nothing out of the ordinary. USADA was aware of the treatment, witnessed the treatment, was aware a TUE request was forthcoming in accordance with their rules and Floyd's attorneys, medical professionals, etc took the necessary time to do everything by the books.

The only thing inexcusable is you posting misleading information about a subject you know absolutely nothing about.

When an athlete needs treatment that is only allowed for legitimate medical purposes, the athlete can seek treatment and file a request later for an exemption so that the fighter isn't denied medical treatment while waiting for approval and so the testing agency can take their time making their decision after the fact without preventing the treatment in the meantime.

[travestyny]

You apparently have no idea how retroactive TUEs work.

USADA witnessed Floyd's condition, witnessed the IV, and took a sample from Floyd immediately before and immediately after the IV. USADA was notified that Floyd would be requesting a TUE.

A proper TUE request is carefully handled by doctors, lawyers, etc and the appropriate parties need time to meticulously put together the documents and accompanying evidence before making the official filing of their request.

19 days is nothing out of the ordinary. USADA was aware of the treatment, witnessed the treatment, was aware a TUE request was forthcoming in accordance with their rules and Floyd's attorneys, medical professionals, etc took the necessary time to do everything by the books.

The only thing inexcusable is you posting misleading information about a subject you know absolutely nothing about.

When an athlete needs treatment that is only allowed for legitimate medical purposes, the athlete can seek treatment and file a request later for an exemption so that the fighter isn't denied medical treatment while waiting for approval and so the testing agency can take their time making their decision after the fact without preventing the treatment in the meantime.

[IMG]//media.*****.com/media/NnGGHE0muVqpO/*****.gif[/IMG]