Why do the same posters who claim VADA is the best side with Wilders dirty foes?

[travestyny]

WADA has to monitor it, not usada, your very dense

Do you think WADA would casually comment about USADA breaking their rule?

And I’m disappointed. You still haven’t learned the difference between your and you’re.

[Johnny Rubber]

Shut up, clown. You're too afraid to even quote me and blatantly ask me to leave you alone. You're not even a man. Get out of here, boy.

Calm the **** down! It's this type "opinionated" attitude that is turning these boards into an SJW type plssing contest over nothing.

Can anyone honestly say that these organizations don't take backhanders? If everyone was clean these people wouldn't have a job, so they have to align with a sport to a certain degree.

Boxing promotors sit in comfy seats while guys attempt to kill each other for entertainment and profit, but that is the other side of the sport. If any agency really wanted to dig into it, they would look at what Lance Armstrong said and use that as a benchmark for all future testing methods.

The sanctioning bodies seem to change remits when they feel like it, with the IBF being the most inconsistent regarding tests and weights etc. All organizations associated with boxing are governed by a single denominator, which is money.

[Shape up]

Do you think WADA would casually comment about USADA breaking their rule?

And I’m disappointed. You still haven’t learned the difference between your and you’re.

Well that's what they said in their statement school teacher, for someone who claims to spell so well, your comprehension is disgraceful, nowhere does it say that the ISTUE over rides the other rules, a prior TUE is just that, prior, if it was an emergency, he needed to apply for an emergency TUE, fact of the matter is that usada thought this would never see the light of day, but it did

[travestyny]

Calm the **** down! It's this type "opinionated" attitude that is turning these boards into an SJW type plssing contest over nothing.

The guy I was referring to is a known troll who brings nothing to the table when it comes to these discussions. If you knew him, you would understand. I don't know you, so respect is due.

Can anyone honestly say that these organizations don't take backhanders? If everyone was clean these people wouldn't have a job, so they have to align with a sport to a certain degree.

Boxing promotors sit in comfy seats while guys attempt to kill each other for entertainment and profit, but that is the other side of the sport. If any agency really wanted to dig into it, they would look at what Lance Armstrong said and use that as a benchmark for all future testing methods.

The sanctioning bodies seem to change remits when they feel like it, with the IBF being the most inconsistent regarding tests and weights etc. All organizations associated with boxing are governed by a single denominator, which is money.

Sure. I have no problem with your post. But we are talking about something very specific.

Speculating that USADA took payments....ok fine. The point of the matter is...IT WOULDN'T BE ENOUGH. To have used PED's for this test, the amount of people who would have had to be paid off would be large enough that it's a poor investment for Mayweather Promotions.

A. Pay off USADA
B. Pay off the doping control officer
C. Pay off the paramedic
D. Pay off the doctor that filled out the TUE application
E. Pay of the the****utic use exemptions committee (at least 3 doctors)
F. Pay off the WADA lab?
G. Pay off WADA?

The point of the matter is that the conspiracy theory makes zero sense. If Floyd paid off USADA, all USADA would have to do is....

A. Tell him when the tests are coming
B. STAY OUT OF THE WAY.

It makes no sense for Floyd to have paid money to have USADA reveal shady activity to WADA, NSAC, Pacquiao, and the world.

The goons who keep posting about this know it. If anyone can make sense of it, by all means, let me know. I'm all ears.

[travestyny]

Well that's what they said in their statement school teacher, for someone who claims to spell so well, your comprehension is disgraceful, nowhere does it say that the ISTUE over rides the other rules, a prior TUE is just that, prior, if it was an emergency, he needed to apply for an emergency TUE, fact of the matter is that usada thought this would never see the light of day, but it did

Um....they thought it wouldn't see the light of day?????


Excuse me, if they were paid off, it WOULDN'T SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY.

All they had to do was say, "Floyd, this is serious. You can do what you like, but we are turning our back to it. If you get caught, it's on you, because we damn sure aren't going down for you."

Makes a lot more sense than...

"Ok, thanks for the money. Now what we will do is document this all, involve a DCO and a paramedic, and your doctor. Have it written up. Send it to 3 doctors. Then upload it online to have it sent to WADA. Then we'll tell NSAC about it, and Pacquiao. Oh, and we'll take a sample from before the IV and after the IV. There is a chance you could fail because of that, but hey. We'll deal with that when it happens."

Now you tell me, which one makes more sense, smart guy?