Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rumor: NSAC will move Friday's weigh-in to 10AM to give Canelo more time to rehydrate

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    golovkin fans are shook

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by stuff jones View Post
      Source of GTFO.
      It's in here. , The fighthub reporter or the group of reporters it sounds like heard the rumor, and brough tit up to Harold, and he seemed to be aware of it too and said it was crazy. At least I think that's how it went down. I can't rewatch the vid right now and I didn't transcribe it.

      Comment


        #13
        The NSAC has been wanting to move the weigh ins to ealier for a while now. They started with UFC events last year. Talking corruption is laughable.

        Golovkin and Canelo don't have to weigh in the day of. If they want the IBF title they do. It's their choice.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Boxing42 View Post
          golovkin fans are shook
          If someone gave you video proof that your favorite fighter was blackmailed into taking a dive in their upcoming fight, you would be "shook" that he would lose, too, not because you think your favorite fighter isn't good enough, but because you're worried he's blackmailed into taking a dive.

          This is no different. I'm not "shook" that Canelo would beat GGG on an even playing field, but I am worried about an even playing field. If enough advantages are stacked up in favor of the inferior fighter, like 1. the ref, 2. judges, 3. changed weigh-in time, 4. the opponent has to weigh in twice, 5. age, then yes, sometimes five significant advantages stacked up in favor of the inferior fighter can be enough to tip the scales so that the inferior fighter can at least make it close, and then the judges can give it to him.

          What kind of fan are you anyway? Clearly not a boxing fan, or a Golovkin fan. All I'm interested in is a fair playing field.

          If you're scared of a fair playing field, then you're the one that's shook Canelo can't beat GGG, not me.

          Comment


            #15
            What a *****... the excuses are coming out of the hype jobs scared bunboys already

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Boxing Logic View Post
              If someone gave you video proof that your favorite fighter was blackmailed into taking a dive in their upcoming fight, you would be "shook" that he would lose, too, not because you think your favorite fighter isn't good enough, but because you're worried he's blackmailed into taking a dive.

              This is no different. I'm not "shook" that Canelo would beat GGG on an even playing field, but I am worried about an even playing field. If enough advantages are stacked up in favor of the inferior fighter, like 1. the ref, 2. judges, 3. changed weigh-in time, 4. the opponent has to weigh in twice, 5. age, then yes, sometimes five significant advantages stacked up in favor of the inferior fighter can be enough to tip the scales so that the inferior fighter can at least make it close, and then the judges can give it to him.

              What kind of fan are you anyway? Clearly not a boxing fan, or a Golovkin fan. All I'm interested in is a fair playing field.

              If you're scared of a fair playing field, then you're the one that's shook Canelo can't beat GGG, not me.
              The playing field is even. Both fighters have a choice. Fight for the IBF title or don't. If Golovkin chooses to and Canelo doesn't then Golovkins own damn fault.

              Comment


                #17
                Woooooooow

                You GGG fans are *****ing bricks.

                So now you guys are worried canelo will be bigger than the naturally bigger guy.

                Smh

                You guys are nervous as fuuuuck for this fight.

                Cry baby biitches

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Boxing Logic View Post
                  If someone gave you video proof that your favorite fighter was blackmailed into taking a dive in their upcoming fight, you would be "shook" that he would lose, too, not because you think your favorite fighter isn't good enough, but because you're worried he's blackmailed into taking a dive.

                  This is no different. I'm not "shook" that Canelo would beat GGG on an even playing field, but I am worried about an even playing field. If enough advantages are stacked up in favor of the inferior fighter, like 1. the ref, 2. judges, 3. changed weigh-in time, 4. the opponent has to weigh in twice, 5. age, then yes, sometimes five significant advantages stacked up in favor of the inferior fighter can be enough to tip the scales so that the inferior fighter can at least make it close, and then the judges can give it to him.

                  What kind of fan are you anyway? Clearly not a boxing fan, or a Golovkin fan. All I'm interested in is a fair playing field.

                  If you're scared of a fair playing field, then you're the one that's shook Canelo can't beat GGG, not me.
                  Even if canelo had advantages that's the power of being A-side 37-1

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                    Someone needs to close this thread. It's full of false information.

                    There is no second day IBF weigh-in if a WBC, WBA or WBO world championship is also at stake. GGG doesn't have to worry about the second day weigh-ins anymore.


                    So it is true that the same day weigh in is even not required for this fight.

                    I was wondering why Abel Sanchez mentioned Canelo and G having to weigh in the morning of the fight in a video last night.

                    It was mentioned that since Triple G had all the titles that it wasn't considered a unification so the same day weigh in had to occur.

                    But I wonder how does a unified champ figure into this?

                    I could have sworn though that the IBF stated that the same day weigh in is only for when just the IBF title is at stake with no other titles?

                    It's confusing.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                      The NSAC has been wanting to move the weigh ins to ealier for a while now. They started with UFC events last year. Talking corruption is laughable.

                      Golovkin and Canelo don't have to weigh in the day of. If they want the IBF title they do. It's their choice.


                      Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                      Someone needs to close this thread. It's full of false information.

                      There is no second day IBF weigh-in if a WBC, WBA or WBO world championship is also at stake. GGG doesn't have to worry about the second day weigh-ins anymore.



                      Okay, we need to get the understanding of the changing of the IBF's rule for second day weigh-ins understood.

                      I know what it says in their rules. But we need to find out how a Unified champion who has the belts figures into this equation and if that also qualifies in unification.

                      If a WBA, WBC or WBO championship is also at stake with the IBF does that also nullify second day weigh in. Does a unified champion also count for unification. This is what we need to find out.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP