Comments Thread For: Marquez: Drilling Pacquiao is The Unforgettable Career Moment!

[aboutfkntime]

Floyd is objectively ranked ahead Pacquiao and marquez......only a pacf@g would argue against this.

and, they are !

[Xi_]

Barrera wasn't prime, Morales was shot to pieces(even then he still managed to whoop Pacquiao in one of their fights) and Marquez beat the living **** outta Poochiao in every one oftheir fights. Ranking him above floyd is objectively absurd.

[Xi_]

and, they are !

Oh i know.....which is why i had to point that out. No real boxing analysis/expert actually ranks Pacquiao above floyd.

[ironmt]

and nobody did

so, why are you crying again..... ?

oh right, because I simply pointed out that Mayweather is a better ATG than Pacquiao

fair enough, carry on

Dude, are you seriously mentally ******ed?

I provided a video showing Bert Sugar(a respected boxing historian) naming Pacquiao as an ATG after beating Margarito back In 2010.

You responded by stating that Pacquiao Is not an ATG, refuting what Sugar had to say as If you have more credibilty than he does. Below Is your response.

that was rubbish

Sugar should have known better than to comment on a fighter who's career is still unfolding

Bert Sugar lost a little credibility before he died, unfortunately

I than responded to another member stating that Mayweather, Marquez and Pacquiao are all ATG'S

As you said, all 3 are ATG's. None of us can deny that fact regardless of how much we may dislike them.

And then you follow up with the following response

nobody said that he wasn't an ATG


You than claim that Pacquiao beat an old Marco Antonio Barrera who was 29 years old while giving credit to Mayweather for beating a 36 year old Pacquiao.


You are a walking talking contradiction and a douchbag of the highest level. You have zero credibility and you continue to bury yourself every time you post.

[UNBIASED BOXING]

Barrera wasn't prime, Morales was shot to pieces(even then he still managed to whoop Pacquiao in one of their fights) and Marquez beat the living **** outta Poochiao in every one oftheir fights. Ranking him above floyd is objectively absurd.

I only agreed with your very last statement, that he is behind Floyd. The only credit I give to him in that regard, is that he is physically the smaller man and has moved up far more weight classes.

But then you just had to talk bullchit. Marquez lost the first two fights. Robbed fight #3. Won the 4th fight.

Barrera and Morales were both 29 when they first fought Pacquiao. If you are going to whine and say they weren't in their prime, then Pacquiao wasn't in his prime when he whooped Barrera (who coincidentally beat Morales prior to losing to Pacquiao), and when he barely lost to Morales the first fight, when he was around 27? years old.


Regardless, at the end of the day, Pacquiao is ranked higher than all three of those guys, and Floyd is ranked higher than Pacquiao.

[HanzGruber]

damn juan still knows how to get the pac turds panties in a bunch lol

[aboutfkntime]

Dude, are you seriously mentally ******ed?

I provided a video showing Bert Sugar(a respected boxing historian) naming Pacquiao as an ATG after beating Margarito back In 2010.

You responded by stating that Pacquiao Is not an ATG, refuting what Sugar had to say as If you have more credibilty than he does. Below Is your response.

that was rubbish

Sugar should have known better than to comment on a fighter who's career is still unfolding

Bert Sugar lost a little credibility before he died, unfortunately

I than responded to another member stating that Mayweather, Marquez and Pacquiao are all ATG'S

As you said, all 3 are ATG's. None of us can deny that fact regardless of how much we may dislike them.

And then you follow up with the following response

nobody said that he wasn't an ATG


You than claim that Pacquiao beat an old Marco Antonio Barrera who was 29 years old while giving credit to Mayweather for beating a 36 year old Pacquiao.


You are a walking talking contradiction and a douchbag of the highest level. You have zero credibility and you continue to bury yourself every time you post.

kid.....

NOBODY said that Pac aint an ATG

read the bold.....

that was rubbish

Sugar should have known better than to comment on a fighter who's career is still unfolding

Bert Sugar lost a little credibility before he died, unfortunately

what has been proven since Sugar died is.....

* Pacquiao is NOT better than Mayweather
* Pacquiao could never distance himself from Marquez
* Pacquiao is better than Tim Bradley, but not by much

I have Pacquiao in/around Hoya

he beat a bunch of names (not as many as Hoya)..... there are question-marks over some of his wins/opponents (more than Hoya)..... the main difference is, Oscar fought EVERYONE, until he retired

Sugar did not see Pacquiao clearly outboxed by Marquez in the 3rd fight, and KTFO by him in the 4th..... he did not see Pacquiao undressed by Mayweather..... and he did not see Bradley run him real close.....

..... also, those factors..... will put Pacquiao's loss to a faded Morales in better perspective

but yea I do agree with you, Pac and Marquez are both great

why are you wetting yourself..... ?

[NC Uppercut]

That will always be one of my first thoughts when Marquez is mentioned, with #2 being the weight issue when he fought Floyd

[ironmt]

kid.....

NOBODY said that Pac aint an ATG

read the bold.....





why are you wetting yourself..... ?

You said Pacquiao wasn't an ATG when you denied Bert Sugar calling him an ATG. Remember?

that was rubbish

Sugar should have known better than to comment on a fighter who's career is still unfolding

Bert Sugar lost a little credibility before he died, unfortunately.


Now you want to change your story. Does wetting yourself bring back memories of when you were ******ed? You seem to have a wetting fetish.

[ironmt]

clown, I never said any such thing

the other clown that you are defending said that

he even made a big list of common opponents and tried to say that Pac had better wins

I said FACT: Pacquiao could never distance himself from Marquez

Another ****** post showing your Intelligence level. I can't see how anyone that reads your posts doesn't see how you consistently contradict yourself.

I am now going to prove once again how ****** you are and It Is getting easier and easier to do.

These are your words and clearly shows you comparing Mayweather and Pacquiao's common opponent In Juan Manuel Marquez.


Pacquiao could never distance himself from Marquez. He also white-washed Marquez, which Pac could not do.

So again let's compare common opponents and see who was able to distance themselves and who performed better with their common opponents.

1. Pacquiao vs Cotto or Mayweather vs Cotto

Pacquiao won by TKO rd 12- Mayweather won a UD


2. Pacquiao vs Hatton or Mayweather vs Hatton

Pacquiao won by KO rd 2- Mayweather won by TKO rd 10


3. Pacquiao vs De La Hoya or Mayweather vs De La Hoya

Pacquiao won by TKO rd 8- Mayweather won by SPLIT DECISION


4. Pacquiao vs Mosley or Mayweather vs Mosley

Both won by UD with Floyd being rocked and hanging on for dear life In
the second round while Pacquiao dropped Mosley In the 3rd round and
won an easy UD.