Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

British Boxing Board statement on Tyson & Hughie Fury

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by BoxingFan85 View Post
    So the tribunal is only for Tyson?
    Wasn't Tyson & Hughie both suspected of nandrolone usage in 2015..
    No, Hughie has to go in front of the tribunal too. What Robert Smith is saying is that Tyson's current suspension is not connected to Hughie in any way. He's suspended for using coke and being mentally unfit to box.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by BoxingFan85 View Post
      BTW, what with your avi though? Fool's Garden - Lemon Tree related?
      The Stone Roses album cover

      Comment


        #13
        1000% ILLUMINATI are targeting Tyson Fury - why retest Tyson's blood & urine samples from 2015? funny isn't it of all the people - the MOST vocalist of them all. If Fury can't box boxing is DEAD.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by deathofaclown View Post
          It says Hughie had a provisional suspension, which probably just means he was suspended while they looked into the case. It seems they have no reason to be banned so Hughie's suspension was lifted.

          As for Tyson, he's only suspended due to mental health issues and ******* use. They can't issue boxing licenses to those who are not cleared to fight due to mental health problems. Because ******* isn't a PED and because he has mental health issues, i'm assuming the tribunal is more to do with whether he's in the right frame of mind to fight, not because of doping.
          The tribunal is for the nandrolone accusation only. It's a separate issue from the coke and depression. What Smith is saying is that if Tyson applies to have his suspension lifted, the BBBoC will examine his situation and decide if he's fit to fight. If he's found guilty of using nandrolone by the tribunal doe, he'll be banned for that, for sure.

          Comment


            #15
            Sounds like the BBBoC know no more than anyone on this forum and even if they did and were bound by a high profile gagging order subject from the courts brought about by the Fury employemwnt of the QC brought in to defend them they would be unable to say any more as they'd be in breach of confidentiality.

            This Smith statement proves nothing, no guilt nor innocence. A waste of a thread shining no new information on anything just desperate reaching to prove the innonce of two guys you neither know or truly know anything about.

            Here's what we do know, Peter Fluff Furry has signed time for dishonest deeds, hence making him a dishonest person. It's in his genetics.

            Kafkod, are you a gypsy ?

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by BoxingFan85 View Post
              That's stretching it too much isnt it.. They still have the tribunal to clear the air.. They were still tested +ve
              But neither have been PROVEN guilty of anything.

              From what I understand, the levels were so low, they could have been naturally occurring.

              It's just like due process in a court of law - there's a HUGE difference between being arrested, then charged, and then actually being proven guilty.

              AS of now, neither Fury is guilty of anything regarding PED usage.

              And I expect both will be cleared by summer.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by MoneyKing View Post
                1000% ILLUMINATI are targeting Tyson Fury - why retest Tyson's blood & urine samples from 2015? funny isn't it of all the people - the MOST vocalist of them all. If Fury can't box boxing is DEAD.
                Wasn't their an inter dimensional ***ish Reptile who was prepared to go on record to defend Fury, he admitted to tainting his offal ? but unfortunately he disappeared ? That damn illuminati must have gotten to him. No one is safe ! Damn ***'s.

                We should protest on the streets of London.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                  No, Hughie has to go in front of the tribunal too. What Robert Smith is saying is that Tyson's current suspension is not connected to Hughie in any way. He's suspended for using coke and being mentally unfit to box.
                  Makes sense..

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by adrikitty View Post
                    But neither have been PROVEN guilty of anything.

                    From what I understand, the levels were so low, they could have been naturally occurring.

                    It's just like due process in a court of law - there's a HUGE difference between being arrested, then charged, and then actually being proven guilty.

                    AS of now, neither Fury is guilty of anything regarding PED usage.

                    And I expect both will be cleared by summer.
                    You hope so, right ?

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                      No, Hughie has to go in front of the tribunal too. What Robert Smith is saying is that Tyson's current suspension is not connected to Hughie in any way. He's suspended for using coke and being mentally unfit to box.
                      The medial card he played to avoid being sued for breach of contract by Klitschko ? You're still buying into this mentally unfit story aren't you ? Lmao.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP