Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBC's New Rule - Fighter's Father Can NOT Be Chief Second

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Comments Thread For: WBC's New Rule - Fighter's Father Can NOT Be Chief Second

    WBC pass ruling that will prohibit fathers from being chief-second to their son


    Matt Christie
    December 13, 2016

    AT their Annual Convention today, the WBC passed a ruling that will prohibit fathers being chief-second to their son in WBC-regulated contests. The reasoning ?delivered by President Mauricio Sulaiman ?behind the move was over concerns that the father may not act in the best interest of their son if he’s in a difficult fight, and may let the bout go on longer than necessary.

    While no commencement date was announced, it could have implications on the March 4 unification showdown between WBC welterweight champion Danny Garcia ?famously trained by his father, Angel Garcia ?and WBA boss, Keith Thurman. It is not clear if the WBA’s involvement would allow the ruling to be enforced.

    Other partnerships this could affect include Floyd Mayweather Jnr and Snr, should “Money?ever return, and Chris Eubank Jnr and Snr ?who today announced an ITV pay-per-view event at super-middleweight ?should they compete in WBC title fights.

    Fathers will still be permitted to train their sons for WBC-regulated contests, and allowed in the corner, but not as the chief cornerman and decision-maker.

    The motion was met with some resistance from the inaugural trainers committee that consists of Abel Sanchez, Joe Gallagher, Eddie Mustafa Muhammad, and Stacey McKinley, but was ultimately passed by the committee.

    This is not the first time the WBC have discussed this ruling, with talk of enforcing it as far back as 2009.

    Read more at:

    #2
    But...why?

    Comment


      #3
      *** the WBC!

      Comment


        #4
        Wbc are a bunch of jerk offs.... maybe Danny shouldn't pay them their sanctioning fee then... I'm sure they'll "come to an agreement" $$$

        Comment


          #5
          no it wont

          "Fathers will still be permitted to train their sons for WBC-regulated contests, and allowed in the corner, but not as the chief cornerman and decision-maker."

          as if theyre gonna say hey you cant say those words to him, during breaks

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
            no it wont

            "Fathers will still be permitted to train their sons for WBC-regulated contests, and allowed in the corner, but not as the chief cornerman and decision-maker."

            as if theyre gonna say hey you cant say those words to him, during breaks
            That's exactly what Angel is. Chief cornerman and decision maker.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Beercules View Post
              But...why?
              This is their reasoning:

              behind the move was over concerns that the father may not act in the best interest of their son if he’s in a difficult fight, and may let the bout go on longer than necessary.
              But it seems like the opposite would be true with your father in the corner. He'd act in the best interest of his son and be he main one who doesn't want to see his son hurt.

              Comment


                #8
                Anyone thinks Garcia would pull out of the bout because of this?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by siablo14 View Post
                  Anyone thinks Garcia would pull out of the bout because of this?
                  No hell just drop the belt.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    The motives seem noble enough but it is a strange rule that doesn't seem particularly enforceable if you still allow a father in the corner.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP