Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

List 10 fighters with a better resume than Floyd Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Do people even know what ****ed up competition Pacquiao had to go through because of a **** Promoter and adviser in Muhammad and Al Haymon? Barrera, Marquez, Morales back to back, three ATG's in the span of two years, what kind of promoter does that?

    Pacquiao has Barrera, Marquez, Morales, Cotto, Ledwaba, Margarito, Ricky Hatton, Oscar, Bradley, that type of resume alone is greater than all of Mayweather's resume.

    Does Mayweather have a Prime ATG at their best weight class? The answer is no.
    Does Pacquiao have a Prime ATG at their best weight class? The answer is Three.

    Its not even comparable, and only biased fans would say otherwise.

    Comment


      PAC was always considered to have a better resume, but somewhere along the line Floyd was seen as comparable to PAC. This happened when Floyd beat nelo and PAC?

      Your gonna have to do better than that?
      Last edited by hugh grant; 10-13-2016, 08:26 AM.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Tom Cruise View Post
        Ezzard Charles is debateable?

        Not debateable in the slightest imo. Charles clearly has the deeper resume, featuring greater fighters and more impressive performances against them



        most of the people who are going to post in this thread have zero business talking about fighters who fought in black in white, and have maybe, [and i mean maybe,] seen 5 black and white fights in their lifetimes.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
          Do people even know what ****ed up competition Pacquiao had to go through because of a **** Promoter and adviser in Muhammad and Al Haymon? Barrera, Marquez, Morales back to back, three ATG's in the span of two years, what kind of promoter does that?

          Pacquiao has Barrera, Marquez, Morales, Cotto, Ledwaba, Margarito, Ricky Hatton, Oscar, Bradley, that type of resume alone is greater than all of Mayweather's resume.

          Does Mayweather have a Prime ATG at their best weight class? The answer is no.
          Does Pacquiao have a Prime ATG at their best weight class? The answer is Three.

          Its not even comparable, and only biased fans would say otherwise.
          Lol SRR fought Jake Lamotta twice in the same month...with a 10lb weight disadvantage. Quit complaining.

          Comment


            Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
            PAC was always considered to have a better resume, but somewhere along the line Floyd was seen as comparable to PAC. This happened when Floyd beat nelo and PAC?

            Your gonna have to do better than that?
            mayweather had a better resume before he beat Pac

            losses count, he never beat JMM clearly once out of 4 tries

            Mayweather beat more champions and hall of famers than Pac

            he also defended his titles like 3x the amount of times manny did

            floyd white washed him

            didnt need a million mismatches, he was also more dominant than Manny

            no ko losses to no names, no ko loss to ancient Marquez either

            the hype train is over

            Mayweather is the best of the era, had the better resume and will be remembered as the greater fighter

            its time you finally come to terms with this bro.....Manny is a great fighter, he was just never the fighter the media pushed, the man to beat mayweather, knock him cold, or the best of the era.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Godsfly View Post
              u can go on and on with people who don't officially have better records then mayweather........anyone can do that.


              Robinson
              Holyfield
              Duran
              Moore
              Armstrong

              are correct.


              chavez sr is debatable......Pacquiao NO. Barrera NO. hagler NO. tito NO. heans & charles is debatable.


              so u named 5.
              You just exposed yourself.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Mr.DagoWop View Post
                You just exposed yourself.
                ......charles has one of the best resumes of all time.....pure quality from 160-heavyweight

                true legend.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
                  Do people even know what ****ed up competition Pacquiao had to go through because of a **** Promoter and adviser in Muhammad and Al Haymon? Barrera, Marquez, Morales back to back, three ATG's in the span of two years, what kind of promoter does that?

                  Pacquiao has Barrera, Marquez, Morales, Cotto, Ledwaba, Margarito, Ricky Hatton GT, Oscar, Bradley, that type of resume alone is greater than all of Mayweather's resume.

                  Does Mayweather have a Prime ATG at their best weight class? The answer is no.
                  Does Pacquiao have a Prime ATG at their best weight class? The answer is Three.

                  Its not even comparable, and only biased fans would say otherwise.
                  Name these three prime atg please...... Morales wasn't prime, neither was Barrera and Marquez beat him including a ko.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
                    ......charles has one of the best resumes of all time.....pure quality from 160-heavyweight

                    true legend.
                    He's one of my favorite fighters of all time. People only see that 25 losses and don't look into it. At first glance his resume may seem like it's missing something but when people take the time to actually research the fighters he fought they will realize how tough these fights were. Charles was practically thrown to the wolves in his first year or two as a pro and came out with a fur coat.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Mr.DagoWop View Post
                      He's one of my favorite fighters of all time. People only see that 25 losses and don't look into it. At first glance his resume may seem like it's missing something but when people take the time to actually research the fighters he fought they will realize how tough these fights were. Charles was practically thrown to the wolves in his first year or two as a pro and came out with a fur coat.
                      many casuals and newbies see glossy records and think one thing and see 20+ losses and think another

                      thats why i tell posters, watch fights, not highlights, or look up boxrec....doesnt do the fighters justice

                      he didnt start losing regularly until the 50s after he lost the heavyweight title.

                      he started losing to guys he'd already beat

                      also after he killed a man in the ring, he was never the same

                      Charles is the template for what a boxer should be....he had it all, power, speed, reflexes, a good chin, heart, counters, defense, grit.

                      imo the greatest 175er of all time.

                      also top 10 for me all time...starting at 160 and winning the heavyweight title and defending it as many times as he did is no small feat

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP