Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is Lara/GGG a no go cuz of politics but not GGG/Jacobs?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Lol @ how the excuses change. First, it was because they "can't" fight, now Lara (who has a better resume than Ggg by far) has to spend time at 160 first. Fekkn insecure fans protecting their idol from harm....
    If you like Golovkin then you should want to see him in real fights.

    Comment


      #12
      People are ******, that's probably why. They hate Haymon so much and want anything he's attached to to fail miserably. But they become the miserable ones every time Haymon does something innovative in the sport.

      Comment


        #13
        Why doesn't Lara call out Jacobs if he thinks he is such a bad ass middleweight. They are both Haymon fighters and the fight could easily be made. Lara has had defended his title against three garbage fighters since losing to Canelo. He doesn't deserve a fight with the world's best middleweight until he has a win over a good fighter now not years ago. If Lara beats Jacobs GGG would have a reason to fight him. Right now GGG has no logical reason to fight Lara. GGG wants to unify and dominate 160 and knocking out Lara does nothing to help him achieve that goal.

        Comment


          #14
          Jacobs is a middleweight champion coming off a great win and he deserves a fight with GGG. Lara lost to Canelo and then beat three unranked mediocre fighters. He never beat a middleweight in his life. If he wants to fight GGG he should get at the back of the line because numerous top middleweight fighters deserve to fight GGG much more than he does. Lara lost to Canelo and Williams and had a draw with Vanes and Molina. He had to come off the floor twice and come from behind to beat slow average Angulo. He just isn't all that good and no where near in GGG's class. GGG has never lost more than a round or two in any fight.He has never been down or hurt. He almost always wins by KO. No draws or split decisions or close fights mar his perfect record. Lara's record can't remotely compare to GGG's record.

          Comment


            #15
            When was the last time a Haymon fighter fought on HBO?
            How are those guys going to fight on HBO?
            Jacobs team could lobby the WBA to order the fight and if they win purse bids, they can force GGG to fight off HBO or vacate.

            Despite all of DuCubas Jr and Lara's talking, they've never said if Lara would be allowed to fight on HBO.
            If Lara really wanted this fight(he doesn't)he could get that WBA belt off Jacobs and be in the same boat.
            Lobby the WBA to order it and go to purse bids. Win bids and force GGG to fight off PBC or vacate.
            Other than that, they are depending on Haymon to allow them to fight on a rival network(not happening)
            Lara last fought on HBO in 2012 and that was because TopRank won the purse bid for the Vanes-Lara fight.
            Anyone with an IQ over 80 and who has been paying attention should be able to work this out.
            What is your excuse?

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
              Lol @ how the excuses change. First, it was because they "can't" fight, now Lara (who has a better resume than Ggg by far) has to spend time at 160 first. Fekkn insecure fans protecting their idol from harm....
              If you like Golovkin then you should want to see him in real fights.
              As a GGG fan I would love for him to squash Lara like a bug. Lara ran like a scared rabbit from Canelo so he would probably jump out of the ring to avoid GGG. Lara is no threat what so ever to GGG. He would just be easy knock out victim number 22 in a row. Why isn't killer Lara trying to unify 154 like GGG is doing at 160?

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by about.thousands View Post
                GGG/Lara can't happen because Lara is with Haymon. Well so is Jacobs.
                Jacobs is GGG's mandatory. Lara isn't.


                /End thread

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by about.thousands View Post
                  Reading through the comments in this post and every other posts that Lara calls out GGG and the comments are all the same. GGG/Lara can't happen because Lara is with Haymon. Well so is Jacobs. It's not a weight issue because Lara is a bigger SMW and said he'd move up to 160. But people say Jacobs is afraid of GGG because he isn't calling him out.

                  Very good question you pose. Green sent.

                  There's 2-3 GGG fans that I know of that even acknowledge Daniel Jacobs. The rest are irrationale in a sense of they accuse Danny of ducking and GGG having no opponents, but no one can find one interview of Team Golovkin even acknowledging that Daniel Jacobs exists. But Jacobs and Quillin were/are duckin doe and Lara has promotional issues.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by original zero View Post
                    Jacobs is GGG's mandatory. Lara isn't.


                    /End thread
                    He's GGG's mandatory for what belt? Did I miss the WBA announcing they must fight?

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Damn Wicked View Post
                      Lara is not a SMW (super middleweight). He's a JMW/SWW (junior middleweight/ super welterweight).

                      Why would GGG fight a guy that has no drawing power and can't further his career? He's got bigger and better fish to fry. Lara should have a rematch with Molina to avenge his draw (it should have been a loss for Erislandy Lara). Has everyone forgotten that fight?
                      I messed up. I'll edit it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP