<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
    In my post, I was saying that only after years later did we come to know the truth about Lance and Barry even though they were initially not proven to be guilty.
    The truth will come out. I agree.
    Thanks for the clarification.

    Best regards
    Zaroku

    Comment


      Smh at other boxing websites/video comments on YT where black boxing fans (many who were Floyd fans) who are criticizing Floyd's IV usage are being called coons or accused of "hating on another brother." Ridiculous.

      Comment


        Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
        "Floyd could have been dehydrated." Hauser would never say that or else he'd come off as an idiot even though he already is. No.. he said, I repeat

        "Floyd showed no signs of significant dehydration..."

        Case closed. Move on.
        Incorrect again. Hauser said what he said to point out that Floyd did not require an IV. This was using factual data and a key witness (NSAC physician) and Floyd's pre-fight form.





        "When a ring doctor tells a fighter to open his mouth wide at a pre-fight physical examination, the doctor isn’t looking for cavities. He’s checking for loose teeth and cuts inside the mouth. The doctor is also checking the mucous membrane lining inside the fighter’s mouth for signs of dehydration. Furthermore, if a fighter is dehydrated, there are additional signs of that condition in his skin turgor (the time it takes for skin to return to its original position after being pinched). Neither of these conditions was noted by the examining doctor.


        To repeat: Mayweather showed no significant signs of dehydration at his pre-fight physical examination.
        "

        Comment


          You Flo-mo-s are just missing the point. Floyd broke the rules. He basically paid USADA for results that showed he had no illegal substances in his system. This is just right out in plain view. You choose not to see it.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Ruthless One View Post
            Smh at other boxing websites/video comments on YT where black boxing fans (many who were Floyd fans) who are criticizing Floyd's IV usage are being called coons or accused of "hating on another brother." Ridiculous.
            Really?? That is bull!
            Please post links.

            Best regards, zaroku

            Comment


              Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
              As I clearly stated, I don't care for speculative approaches. I only gather what is real, hence testimony or transcription. This is what makes my videos pure. Please share any videos in which you are basing your claim.
              Fair enough. Then I expect to see cameo appearances from racially motivated boxers like Hopkins, Nate Campbell, Mayweather and Devon Alexander as part of your presentation.

              Perhaps you can include an excerpt from the Mayweather interview when he spread lies about how MMA was created so "white people could succeed in combat sports".

              That was probably one most irresponsible claims the racist black fighter Floyd Mayweather contributed to the racist sub-culture.
              Last edited by ReIoaded; 10-17-2015, 08:10 PM.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Zaroku View Post
                Really?? That is bull!
                Please post links.

                Best regards, zaroku
                For example, check the comments on the video I posted.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Ruthless One View Post
                  For example, check the comments on the video I posted.
                  Sorry my old eyes missed them.
                  Thank you.
                  Best regards
                  Zaroku

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                    Incorrect again. Hauser said what he said to point out that Floyd did not require an IV. This was using factual data and a key witness (NSAC physician) and Floyd's pre-fight form.





                    "When a ring doctor tells a fighter to open his mouth wide at a pre-fight physical examination, the doctor isn’t looking for cavities. He’s checking for loose teeth and cuts inside the mouth. The doctor is also checking the mucous membrane lining inside the fighter’s mouth for signs of dehydration. Furthermore, if a fighter is dehydrated, there are additional signs of that condition in his skin turgor (the time it takes for skin to return to its original position after being pinched). Neither of these conditions was noted by the examining doctor.


                    To repeat: Mayweather showed no significant signs of dehydration at his pre-fight physical examination.
                    "
                    You nailed it again.

                    So much facts to dispute Mayweather's dehydration theory.

                    Plus the fact that,


                    If a fighter is dehydrated, his blood pressure is likely to be low and his pulse rate high. That wasn’t the case with Mayweather as evidenced by the Nevada State Athletic Commission medical data sheet.

                    Mayweather’s blood pressure was 118/84. In other words, his systolic blood pressure (pressure when the heart is contracting and pumping blood out) was 118. And his diastolic blood pressure (pressure when the heart is resting between beats) was 84. That’s normal for a professional athlete.

                    Mayweather’s pulse rate – 60 sitting and 66 standing – was also normal.


                    the procedure he used is illegal, that's cheating. the only people that doesn't give a crap about this are floyd's minions who at the same time wish that they could convince everyone else to don't give a crap
                    Last edited by Spoon23; 10-17-2015, 10:02 PM.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by embryo View Post
                      I'm almost positive Hauser did his homework and fact checked everything. He has a Law degree, he knows what he's doing when it comes to building a case and a pile of evidence to prove a point. YOU are not qualified to question his expertise in the field of journalism and research.
                      Incorrect. He even has errors in his latest piece, which I've already pointed out. And he had numerous errors in his original piece.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP