-
-
Hauser is so ****ing lame. Going on and on in his new article with ****** **** like "other sports dont get to pick their testing agency but boxers do"
Which is all bull**** because USADA is IN ADDITION TO NSAC testing. Boxers dont "pick" or pay for NSAC. They agreed to in their contracts to take testing above and beyond NSAC's requirements.
So talking about how such and such baseball player doesnt pick who tests them, well boxers dont either. A direct equivalent would be a baseball player hiring an outside agency to do additional testing beyond MLB's requirements.
But Hauser doesnt try to make sense.Comment
-
I know we have had our differences, but are we cool now???Originally posted by GTTofAK View Post
I think Floyd is fishy! Fishy Floyd, I hope the sport cleans up. I want the best boxer to win, in spite of my sentimental leanings.
I don't know what standard protocol for NCAA, I don't doubt you. You seem to be rational when not berating those of us who do not know what you know. But I get confused, who has jurisdiction over all of this IV, TUE 3 weeks late, in boxing?
Who has the ultimate authority over this??? I would love for all state sanctioning bodies to be under one authoritative sanctioning body. Supreme Sactioning Body & Court for the U.S., and the world. Kinda like FIFA for soccer/futbol.
Who has the authority to compell all sanctioning bodies? I get that a lot of this is contractually based, lawyers hammer out shady deals, because pro boxing is not regulated globally. Amature boxing for the Olympics is, and yet we see shady things take place at the Olympics too.
Take it easy. I don't doubt you, but who has the authority to clean up IVs, PED usage etc.
Thank you & best regards
ZarokuComment
-
Thanks bro. New warriors being minted yearly. I hope boxing cleans itself up.Originally posted by boxinghead530 View Post
Right now, I really like takashi uchiyama. He is a really cool down to earth guy.
I like Naito a lot. I watch him as a commentator on Tokyo Broadcasting Service, for championship fights, and he always has good, insightful boxing points to add to the commentary..
What I hate about listening to Japanese commentators is, they like bringing in marginally cute girls from AKB48 and asking a 19 girl who knows nothing about boxing, what she thought of Roman Gonzalez beating the crap out of some guy.
At the same time, Naito, an ex world champ who whipped one of the Kameda brothers can only add passing comments.
I guess it would be akin to Paris Hilton being asked what she thought of a world championship fight instead of an actual fighter. At least Rosie Perez knows a few things. Japan is weird about things. But it is their country, not mine.
Makes me sick.Comment
-
^ Pathetic el*** going ape****.Originally posted by el*** View Post
The proof that fraud mayweather, usada and all the floyd fanboys are doomed.
Here
(I don't know if you want to put it in your mouth or ********, suit yourself)
One word that USADA’s “Detailed Correction” does not mention is “dehydrated.” Nor does it use “dehydration” or any derivative thereof.
Most likely, that’s because the available evidence strongly suggests that Floyd Mayweather was not dehydrated.
1) What exactly was Mayweather’s “physical condition”?
2) What was the medical justification that led to the decision that an onsite IV was the appropriate treatment?
3) Who made the determination that the IV was medically necessary? A doping control officer can’t make that determination.
4) Who called the paramedic?
5) Which medical service did the paramedic come from?
6) Where is the full paramedic report of the incident?
7) Did USADA independently analyze the solution that was administered to Mayweather by IV? Or did it take the word of Mayweather’s camp that it was saline and vitamins?
8) Who “approved” the IV procedure on site?
9) What was the medical justification and supporting data that led to USADA granting a retroactive the****utic use exemption for an otherwise prohibited IV procedure?
10) Who at USADA made the decision to grant Mayweather a retroactive the****utic use exemption eighteen days after the fight?
11) If the procedure was “approved on site,” why did Mayweather need to apply for and receive a the****utic use exemption almost three weeks later?
12) USADA reported to the Nevada State Athletic Commission that the last blood sample it took from Mayweather prior to the fight was on April 21. Shouldn’t USADA have taken samples on May 1, immediately prior to and after administration of the IV?
13) On how many previous occasions has Mayweather received an IV infusion after the weigh-in for one of his fights?
14) If such infusions did in fact occur, was he given a the****utic use exemption in each instance?
15) And at the risk of sounding simplistic: If Mayweather was dehydrated, why didn't he simply drink several glasses of water after the weigh-in to remedy the problem?
The answer to the last question is that, as earlier noted, the available evidence strongly suggests that Mayweather was not dehydrated. And certainly not dehydrated enough to need an IV infusion equal to roughly 16 percent of his total blood volume.
Last edited by hardvibes; 10-13-2015, 10:07 PM.Comment
-
He is attacking Floyd because Floyd as a p4p should lead by example and Floyd was to be the champion of cleaning up the sport and yet this vet is actually the leader for dirty boxing lolOriginally posted by el*** View Post
Hey haven't I told you to change your sig. I gave you a naked classy Hatton sig that's more artsy than that sig you'v been using.That one I gave you is more decent and civilized rather than that ghastly half naked gay fighter. Man, have some decency in your life EL- F A GLast edited by Spoon23; 10-13-2015, 10:40 PM.Comment
-
too many question to handle for a genius floyd fan.Originally posted by hardvibes View Post^ Pathetic el*** going ape****.
The proof that fraud mayweather, usada and all the floyd fanboys are doomed.
Here (I don't know if you want to put it in your mouth or ********, suit yourself)
One word that USADA’s “Detailed Correction” does not mention is “dehydrated.” Nor does it use “dehydration” or any derivative thereof.
Most likely, that’s because the available evidence strongly suggests that Floyd Mayweather was not dehydrated.
1) What exactly was Mayweather’s “physical condition”?
2) What was the medical justification that led to the decision that an onsite IV was the appropriate treatment?
3) Who made the determination that the IV was medically necessary? A doping control officer can’t make that determination.
4) Who called the paramedic?
5) Which medical service did the paramedic come from?
6) Where is the full paramedic report of the incident?
7) Did USADA independently analyze the solution that was administered to Mayweather by IV? Or did it take the word of Mayweather’s camp that it was saline and vitamins?
8) Who “approved” the IV procedure on site?
9) What was the medical justification and supporting data that led to USADA granting a retroactive the****utic use exemption for an otherwise prohibited IV procedure?
10) Who at USADA made the decision to grant Mayweather a retroactive the****utic use exemption eighteen days after the fight?
11) If the procedure was “approved on site,” why did Mayweather need to apply for and receive a the****utic use exemption almost three weeks later?
12) USADA reported to the Nevada State Athletic Commission that the last blood sample it took from Mayweather prior to the fight was on April 21. Shouldn’t USADA have taken samples on May 1, immediately prior to and after administration of the IV?
13) On how many previous occasions has Mayweather received an IV infusion after the weigh-in for one of his fights?
14) If such infusions did in fact occur, was he given a the****utic use exemption in each instance?
15) And at the risk of sounding simplistic: If Mayweather was dehydrated, why didn't he simply drink several glasses of water after the weigh-in to remedy the problem?
The answer to the last question is that, as earlier noted, the available evidence strongly suggests that Mayweather was not dehydrated. And certainly not dehydrated enough to need an IV infusion equal to roughly 16 percent of his total blood volume.
my question was very simple and they can't answer it.
who administered the IV on Floyd.Comment
-
-
any update on Floyd vs Berto Usada random drug test?Comment
-
Any updates on ANY of Mannys tests , I dont believe they happened for Algieri and Rios , can you show me a result of his tests >Originally posted by Rath View Post
In the meantime have read about Hauser seems he is up to his old somebody told me but I cant produce him tricks .
Once more, Thomas Hauser relied on some anonymous sources in his reporting on HBO, a problem endemic to every one of his much-praised stories that I’ve been virtually alone in publicly criticizing. Hauser’s had Greenburg on the verge of being fired before, but still Greenburg remains; maybe he’ll be there for years, maybe he won’t. This time, Hauser was wrong in a massive way. You now have to wonder whether all of his reporting on the network based on anonymous sources should be cast into doubt.
Here is article questioning Hausers ethics .
Comment
(I don't know if you want to put it in your mouth or ********, suit yourself)
Comment