Originally posted by Bronx2245
View Post
The most succinct passage for me:
It's not an accident Donald ***** names everything after himself. It betrays a central fact about the fundamental emptiness of the legacy that ***** will leave behind. Who else would ever name anything after him? Imagine how you'd feel about a society that did. What exactly has ***** achieved or owned that stands a chance of inspiring future generations to attach his name to anything? This is because outside of *****'s net financial worth, his ultimate value inspires nothing.
It's no different for fighters. The value of a boxer's legacy simply isn't determined by what he has; the greats are remembered for what they give of themselves.
This is the central difference between Pacquiao and Mayweather. No matter how much Mayweather out-earns Pacquiao financially, he can never buy his way out of the fact (that) no great champion in history has been more willing to stink out a fight. Mayweather's legacy will be that he was one of the most exciting fighters in the history of boxing until he stepped into the ring. And none of Pacquiao's well-documented personal failings can erase how much of his life he risked and ultimately left behind inside the ropes.
It's no different for fighters. The value of a boxer's legacy simply isn't determined by what he has; the greats are remembered for what they give of themselves.
This is the central difference between Pacquiao and Mayweather. No matter how much Mayweather out-earns Pacquiao financially, he can never buy his way out of the fact (that) no great champion in history has been more willing to stink out a fight. Mayweather's legacy will be that he was one of the most exciting fighters in the history of boxing until he stepped into the ring. And none of Pacquiao's well-documented personal failings can erase how much of his life he risked and ultimately left behind inside the ropes.
Comment