not picking a winner is just as bad as picking the wrong guy. how can you NOT pick a winner in a championship fight? pathetic
Because both guys are sup par heavyweights compared to the top 5 guys, and they made for an exciting fight. I was glad to have watched it, FOTY material.
Means little as far as the future of the division, and was merely a changing of hands among belt holders.
Do you realize what thread you're arguing with me in?
You were dead wrong, and you aren't good at picking fights. End of story.
Why am I not good at picking fights? I'm not doing well this year, but I nailed pretty much every big fight from 03-05. I went on a huge stretch from 03 to late 04 until Morales lost to Barrera. I had Pacquiao beating Barrera, Tarver KOing Roy, Judah TKOing Spinks, Corrales TKOing Castillo. I mean I called the round in 3 of those 4. I've missed 5 fights in 06, and you missed all 5 of them too.
I don't fancy myself a good sports better by any means. I definitely wouldn't bet on boxing where the underdog wins every other fight. Who wants to bet on a sport where every other week there's an upset? I make my money playing poker online actually, and I'm fine with that.
Dude, every one of you needs to shut the **** up. The ONLY person I know who picked Liakhovich was Cold. Don't act like any of you picked him to win because that's bull****. I went back and got this thread to prove I can take it when I'm wrong, but EVERY person who responded to this was wrong too.
I thought brewster would catch sergie but only gave brewster the slight edge. hes one dimensional and has struggled with journeymen guys and been beaten by pretenders
Comment