Hopkins speaks the truth :ANYWORD:
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hopkins criticises Mayweather (video)
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Joshua Child View PostJust as a note, I don't think Armstrong won a title at middleweight. I'm not sure he even fought at middle? Maybe somebody else will know.
I was pretty sure it was feather, light and welter. Still impressive considering there were no in-between classes but Hopkins doesn't really even know his own history lol.
But let's face it Hopkins isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer is he.
Comment
-
-
jas
Yes because rigo, ggg, ward and Bradley have called themselves the best ever........
Well, if I were undefeated after 17yrs. of fighting at the sport's highest level, and still schoolin' em in my late 30's, havin my peers using fear of needles to duck me, then my head might get a little swole too.
Jus' sayin...Last edited by Farrod; 04-11-2014, 02:51 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View PostYeah I agree aswell I'm just saying for the sake of the argument.
The different level of standards are just ridiculous.
In that time span Floyd has fought multiple P4P fighters, multiple champions, multiple Top 5 ranked guys yet somehow takes no risks?
I want to know a fighter that does take risks.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RubenSonny View PostWhen people were saying Bradley had a better year (2013) than Mayweather I asked if they would feel the same if the roles were reversed...Floyd narrowly beating a 40 year old who hadn't fought in a year and going life and death with Provo or Bradley beating Guerrero and Canelo at 152...If anyone else did what he does they would be 'risktakers'.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RubenSonny View PostWhen people were saying Bradley had a better year (2013) than Mayweather I asked if they would feel the same if the roles were reversed...Floyd narrowly beating a 40 year old who hadn't fought in a year and going life and death with Provo or Bradley DOMINATING Guerrero and Canelo at 152...If anyone else did what he does they would be 'risktakers'.
Comment
Comment