Hulkuiao is back.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I'm worried about Bradley's health because they decided not to do RDT.
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View PostYour right about the highlighted..Yet Pac and Bradley did both just use VADA..I see nothing wrong with them doing it again..Not to mention Bradley still using VADA while Pac has choose not to is just not a good look imo..If Arum and Commission wanna make some changes in the sport I'm all for it..This is a big fight in which both fighters just used a agency that busted a fighter,not to mention a few others..I think you stay with them and work in the commission new testing slowly..Are at least have both fighters tested by both agency's..
The only issue is that this is professional boxing and NSAC doesn't have the cleanest reputation.
But again, using both is a hopeless concept. For instance, when Bradley used both VADA and NSAC at the same time -- he was the fool. The first law is that you protect yourself at all times. Taking a random drug test is NOT protecting yourself, you are protecting your opponent only. Meanwhile, the foolish boxer isn't protected from his opponent! Insanity. You are a boxer, not Jesus.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by radioraheem View PostTesting being done by both agencies is a useless concept. It's useless because the testing takes place in the same and/or similar accredited labs. All VADA and NSAC do is just get the samples, then send them off to a lab. So whether or not they use VADA or NSAC is irrelevant.
The only issue is that this is professional boxing and NSAC doesn't have the cleanest reputation.
But again, using both is a hopeless concept. For instance, when Bradley used both VADA and NSAC at the same time -- he was the fool. The first law is that you protect yourself at all times. Taking a random drug test is NOT protecting yourself, you are protecting your opponent only. Meanwhile, the foolish boxer isn't protected from his opponent! Insanity. You are a boxer, not Jesus.
Comment
-
-
They are both doing NSAC as far as I know. While bradley is also using VADA. Which is interesting cause PAC demanded VADA in his last fight.
The thing that I find interesting is how PAC stays in the philipines for half his camp. You know he's not getting tested by anybody the whole time he's there...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shambrolic View PostOnce Arum got involved... You have no choice but to feel a bad taste in your mouth.
And Radio, thats the line of thinking that enables the ped users lol. Like you say, it takes two to tango but if the ped user has some pull and other dude is the only one doing testing it just makes it so the op knows that while he's on peds the other guy isnt.
It's too bad the second biggest name in boxing seems deadset on doing nothing to help the situation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by radioraheem View PostTesting being done by both agencies is a useless concept. It's useless because the testing takes place in the same and/or similar accredited labs. All VADA and NSAC do is just get the samples, then send them off to a lab. So whether or not they use VADA or NSAC is irrelevant.
The only issue is that this is professional boxing and NSAC doesn't have the cleanest reputation.
But again, using both is a hopeless concept. For instance, when Bradley used both VADA and NSAC at the same time -- he was the fool. The first law is that you protect yourself at all times. Taking a random drug test is NOT protecting yourself, you are protecting your opponent only. Meanwhile, the foolish boxer isn't protected from his opponent! Insanity. You are a boxer, not Jesus.
Comment
-
Comment