100% defensive doesn't mean "sweet science"
I just can't understand why there are people that like to associate Mayweather Jr and his clones' 100%-defensive and boring style of fighting with the term "sweet science" and call "casual fans" anybody who isn't into that --again boring-- style of fighting. I've watched boxing for years, I'm not a "casual fan" and I will always prefer watching people like Manny Pacquiao at his best or Mike Tyson and even Julio Cesar Chavez Sr., I mean people who go forward all the time and do not fear being hit. I call Mayweather's and his clones' style the "cowardly style of fighting" not the "sweet science". Guys like those are always bound to lose anyways, it's just a matter of time. The "sweet science" means boxing in general, no matter the style, not the 100% cowardly-defensive style that Floyd has made so popular. Ah, and BTW he is not undefeated, Castillo defeated him in their first fight, and Castillo is a fighter with a style opposite to Floyd's, yet it's still "sweet science".
Originally posted by ihatebobarum
View Post
Comment