Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Barrera Avoids Pacquiao, Opts For Chavez

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by masterdirector
    okay you ignorant ****suckers, READ THIS CAREFULLY, I'll try to break it down so your crackheaded asses can understand it

    BARRERA IS FIGHTING MARCH 25!!!!

    PACQUAIO CANNOT BE READY TO FIGHT BY MARCH 25!!!

    BARRERA VS. PAC FOR MARCH 25 IS NOT POSSIBLE!!!

    GET IT?! IT'S PRETTY ****ING SIMPLE YOU DUMB ****S!


    Now, if Barrera doesn't fight Pac after Jesus Chavez, he could be accused of ducking Pacquaio. But he's not, he's fighting one of the best 135 lb fighters instead of the best 130 lb fighter who will undoubtedly want more than a couple months before his next fight. Barrera was going to fight SOMEBODY for sure on March 25, it was just a matter of whom. Who else is even available besides Jesus Chavez and Zahir Raheem anyhow?

    I'm not even saying Barrera will or won't beat Pac in a rematch. That's a moot point for this topic. The point is that Barrera is NOT ducking Pacquiao. Look at Barrera's record, it speaks for itself. A guy with over 60 fights and only 4 losses, all to only top guys, is not ducking anybody. Get real.


    First of all, it wasn’t Pacquaio who was offering the rematch our sounding the *****ets about it. It was Barrera. Otherwise, there wouldn't have been any issue about anyone ducking anyone.

    Pacquiao was minding his business concentrating on Pac-EM 2 when Barrera’s camp suddently came out with these macho pronouncements challenging the winner. Barrera was the one making all the noise here, not anyone else. Remember he said something to the effect that he’s ready and willing to avenge his humiliating drubbing “but only on condition that Manny wins…” LOL!

    They knew that March 25th was impossible anyway. That's too much too soon a date for either Morales or Pacquiao to prepare. So why pose ****** conditions and give a bogus date that they understood all along wasn’t doable? And why wait for the aftermath of PAC=EM 2 to announce that they were finally going after Chavez? The timing just speak volumes of their sincerity, or lack thereof.

    Perhaps they were expecting a Morales win? I’m not that harsh, but my point is that Barrera and his team should’ve just kept their big mouths shut in the first place about Pacquiao or made their real plans known a lot sooner, if they really weren’t serious about going after Pac next.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Jose Rizal


      First of all, it wasn’t Pacquaio who was offering the rematch our sounding the *****ets about it. It was Barrera. Otherwise, there wouldn't have been any issue about anyone ducking anyone.

      Pacquiao was minding his business concentrating on Pac-EM 2 when Barrera’s camp suddently came out with these macho pronouncements challenging the winner. Barrera was the one making all the noise here, not anyone else. Remember he said something to the effect that he’s ready and willing to avenge his humiliating drubbing “but only on condition that Manny wins…” LOL!

      They knew that March 25th was impossible anyway. That's too much too soon a date for either Morales or Pacquiao to prepare. So why pose ****** conditions and give a bogus date that they understood all along wasn’t doable? And why wait for the aftermath of PAC=EM 2 to announce that they were finally going after Chavez? The timing just speak volumes of their sincerity, or lack thereof.

      Perhaps they were expecting a Morales win? I’m not that harsh, but my point is that Barrera and his team should’ve just kept their big mouths shut in the first place about Pacquiao or made their real plans known a lot sooner, if they really weren’t serious about going after Pac next.
      Exactly. And now that ***** Barrera gets exposed as a Mexican without a word of honor.

      Just a bag full of beans.

      Comment


        Originally posted by masterdirector
        damn Pac's bandwagon sure did expand. what a bunch of mindless sheep. watch it, if Santino returns he'll surely try to **** you.

        A guy that's won over 60 fights and is clearly going to go down as a legend is trying to duck someone? You've GOT to be either mentally ******ed or a blind Pac fan to believe that bull****.
        Santino already ate his word. Just like 90% of the boxing scene staff and just like a lot of members here who also ate their word.

        I repeat... Try thinking about the term "3 YEARS"
        And you will see MAB and "*****" at the end of that thought.

        Comment


          Originally posted by masterdirector
          oh yeah, Pac has yet to literally kill anybody. Barrera is fighting a guy who killed his last opponent and that weighs more. Yeah, Barrera's really ducking anybody.
          OK genius, ponder this. Max Bear killed his last opponent before fighting James Braddock. Braddock goes in there and whips on a guy who was gun shy for fear of killing another man. Uh, Sensational. Viva Pinoy. You can't stop the Pinoy, uh. Somehow, I beat them haters like Rocky.

          Comment


            I say let's give Barrera to Bobby Pac first, i think that's better match up . that is if Bobby Pacquiao hasn't transformed into a monster yet. we'll find out soon against Hernandez.

            Comment


              Anyone who says that Barrera is NOT ducking Pacquiao is in denial.
              But it's OK, really, we understand.

              Comment


                Originally posted by psychopath
                That's right, they made an announcement.But now what? As I said these people are just looking for media attention. Never care about "palabra de honor", they never think about reputation.

                HYPES doesn't always work buddy, and people are not that ****** to see and understand what these people are doing.
                They even PROMISED to give Pac two or three months to lick his wounds, if he gets cut. Now, they can't wait to get it on with Chavez and declares they want to "make history". History was always there to be made and they paid it scant attention, loudly calling out Pac/Morales, wishing, I presume, that there would be a Morales-MAB IV. When, it became clear that what can only be in store is a Pac-MAB II, Chavez got quickly resurrected! (Though, again, I doubt it was ever dead, notwithstanding the Golden Boy Prom bravado).

                Two years. They said nothing except put Pac down as Morales' left-over. Now, they won't have anything to do with even a morsel.

                MAB was a great one and never ducked anyone that I can recall. If at all, for years, he was the one being ducked. That's why he had to settle for a WBO belt early in his career. But to mix and match the MAB that was with the MAB that is while casting a blind eye on the latest developments do not wash.

                I have the highest regard for MAB and what he has accomplished. He's well on his way to the Hall. But that respect is gravely challenged by what he has been doing lately. When he gets to Canastota, it surely won't be because he fought the Pedens and Fanas of this world.

                I know MAB doesn't care much about what I think, but I'm saying it just the same.

                Comment


                  Barrera is looking chubby nowadays, he better work his ass off or Chavez will kill him.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by JaNnO
                    You nailed it right on the head, sir! Dela Hoya is a real ***** for hitchriding the Pacman express everytime it comes around. He's a good businessman alright but his credibility is at all time low right now because all of this bitching.

                    As for MAB, I always think that he has been a damaged good after the mauling he received from Pacman. Granted he was able to rebound from that low and is now a two-belt holder (take note of "holder"). The only notable win he had after his loss to Pacman was against El Terrible and it was even a toss up. Beating washed up guys like Ayala, Fana and Peden didn't say a lot to me. Everybody thinks that "A win is a win.". However I say "How you win or lose is what matters".

                    Look at Pac and Erik. Pac lost to Erik but his stock rose even higher after the fight. The same way, Erik lost to Barrera but he became even greater to peoples' eyes.
                    Heya there buddy! Thanks!

                    When you get your second belt at the expense of a sparmate, I doubt there's much "ALLELUJAH!" that you can hear. You're right, fights like those you enumerated do not speak well, but only narrate volumes on the type of MAB that has come to be.

                    To justify the Chavez fight, MAB hacks are saying Chavez won't be easy prey for MAB. Chavez may just prove them right and punctuate his message with an excalamation point. Then, MAB apologists would go on and on about how MAB HAS GOTTEN OLD and a younger MAB would have taken cae of bizniz quickly and easily.

                    Once that happens, it won't be any bigger of a surprise to me than the decision to resurrect (if "resurrection" is the operative word) the Chavez fight.

                    Good t'see ya, pal!

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by turboflat4
                      I say let's give Barrera to Bobby Pac first, i think that's better match up . that is if Bobby Pacquiao hasn't transformed into a monster yet. we'll find out soon against Hernandez.
                      Now, that's a thought...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP