Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

One thing I have to give Cotto props for.......

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #1

    One thing I have to give Cotto props for.......

    He never seems to back down from a fight. He fought Margarito when it seemed as though none of the top WW wanted anything to do with him. He fought both Mayweather and Pacquiao and he took a risk by fighting Trout who while realtively unproven, was a young talented undefeated fighter. I give Miguel props for his desire to fight the best.
    #2
    Originally posted by Since 1985 View Post
    He never seems to back down from a fight. He fought Margarito when it seemed as though none of the top WW wanted anything to do with him. He fought both Mayweather and Pacquiao and he took a risk by fighting Trout who while realtively unproven, was a young talented undefeated fighter. I give Miguel props for his desire to fight the best.
    Yup, one thing you cant take away from cotto is he has the balls to get in their. No Excuses.

    Comment

      #3
      only haters don't give him credit for that..

      Comment

        #4
        Where is Fanatic?

        Comment

          #5
          Originally posted by ElBossHogg?/strong> View Post
          Yup, one thing you cant take away from cotto is he has the balls to get in their. No Excuses.
          Miguel along with Juan Manuel Marquez and Carl Froch are some of the fighters I respect the most. They seem to fight anybody with no questions asked.

          Comment

            #6
            he fought Margarito after Williams and Clottey beat that ass he seemed vulnerable and was big underdog in that fight fought Pacquiao and Mayweather for paydays and trout was a no name

            lets not forget that please

            Comment

              #7
              Originally posted by Phenom View Post
              he fought Margarito after Williams and Clottey beat that ass he seemed vulnerable and was big underdog in that fight fought Pacquiao and Mayweather for paydays and trout was a no name

              lets not forget that please
              We all know that at times even money isn't enough to entice fighters to fight each other. All of the aformentioned fights were risks for Cotto, as evidenced by his losing all of them.

              Comment

                #8
                Originally posted by Phenom View Post
                he fought Margarito after Williams and Clottey beat that ass he seemed vulnerable and was big underdog in that fight fought Pacquiao and Mayweather for paydays and trout was a no name

                lets not forget that please
                Lets not forget that on this site most of Cottos haters said he would never rematch Plasterman.

                Not only did he rematch Senor Brick but he beat the plaster chips off him.

                Comment

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Since 1985 View Post
                  We all know that at times even money isn't enough to entice fighters to fight each other. All of the aformentioned fights were risks for Cotto, as evidenced by his losing all of them.
                  he wasn't supposed to lose to Margarito this was his coming out party to PPV kind of like Floyd vs Gatti so no it wasnt a huge risk low reward fight
                  Money was the only reason he took a catchweight fight he himself said wasn't comfortable with it pretty much he was supposed to lose to Pacquiao and Mayweather

                  Comment

                    #10
                    Yep an ol skool fighter, thats why he is not undefeated, maybe Mayweather wouldnt be undefeated if he challenge himself in his fights

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP